head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs openhuman
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars, 5,164 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openhuman has 42,503 stars, 4,209 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 25% (53,202 vs 42,503 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; openhuman is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, openhuman 10%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | openhuman | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 43K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 4.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick openhuman if
- You want the openhuman feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and openhuman fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About openhuman
OpenHuman OpenHuman is your personal AI super intelligence: a brain that remembers everything, a fantastic orchestrator, a deep researcher. Local first, simple, powerful. Discussions • Discord • Reddit • X/Twitter • Docs • Follow @senamakel (Creator) 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇵🇰 اردو Early Beta : Under active development. Expect rough edges. OpenHuman is not AGI. But it is a meaningful architectural step closer, with better memory, better orchestration, and better tooling. 🎉 Within one week of launch, OpenHuman became the number one trending repository on GitHub for nine days in a…
read the full openhuman overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or openhuman more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars and openhuman has 42,503. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and openhuman free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and openhuman under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and openhuman?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and openhuman in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or openhuman?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,202 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose openhuman if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.