head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs gptme
Cherry Studio has 52,003 GitHub stars, 4,978 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped today. gptme has 4,420 stars, 432 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped today. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 1,077% (52,003 vs 4,420 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; gptme is written in Python under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, gptme 10%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | gptme | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 52K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.0K | ⑂ 432 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gptme if
- You want the gptme feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and gptme fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
Cherry Studio is a cross platform desktop application for interacting with large language models, built in TypeScript under the AGPL 3.0 license. It operates in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, providing a unified interface to access cloud hosted models (OpenAI, Gemini, Anthropic), web services (Claude, Poe, Perplexity), and locally hosted models via Ollama or LM Studio.
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About gptme
gptme is a free and open source, provider agnostic AI agent that runs in any terminal — on a laptop, over SSH, in tmux, on headless servers, or in CI pipelines — and is aimed at developers and knowledge workers who want a local first coding and automation assistant they can extend into persistent autonomous agents.
read the full gptme overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or gptme more popular?
Cherry Studio has 52,003 GitHub stars and gptme has 4,420. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and gptme free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and gptme under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and gptme?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and gptme in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or gptme?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (52,003 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose gptme if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.