head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs gptme
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars, 5,172 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gptme has 4,469 stars, 467 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 1,091% (53,242 vs 4,469 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; gptme is written in Python under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, gptme 10%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | gptme | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 467 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gptme if
- You want the gptme feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and gptme fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About gptme
gptme /ʤiː piː tiː miː/ what does it stand for? Getting Started • Downloads • Website • Documentation 📜 A personal AI agent that runs anywhere a terminal runs — your laptop, ssh sessions, tmux, headless servers, CI pipelines. Provider agnostic, local first, and unconstrained: ships with shell, Python, web, vision, and everything else an agent needs. A great coding agent, but general purpose enough to assist in all kinds of knowledge work. Free and open source. Works with Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, or fully local via llama.cpp — your data, your models, your terminal. A capable…
read the full gptme overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or gptme more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars and gptme has 4,469. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and gptme free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and gptme under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and gptme?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and gptme in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or gptme?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,242 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose gptme if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.