head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs FLUJO
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars, 5,164 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FLUJO has 671 stars, 92 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 7,829% (53,202 vs 671 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; FLUJO is written in TypeScript under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, FLUJO 14%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (mcp-client), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | FLUJO | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 671 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 92 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FLUJO if
- You want the FLUJO feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and FLUJO fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About FLUJO
FLUJO Build private AI agents visually. Run them your way. Connect your AIs and apps, build an agent, then talk to it, automate it, or call it from other software. FLUJO is open source and local first. Start with the guided setup, build agents as simple step by step recipes or expert visual flows, inspect every run, and expose the same agents through OpenAI compatible and MCP endpoints — while your keys and data stay under your control. Simple + visual builders · MCP native · Multi model · Built in debugger · Automation Visit flujo.com.co → · Watch the 2:28 product film → · Install FLUJO ↓ · Explore features ↓ ·…
read the full FLUJO overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or FLUJO more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars and FLUJO has 671. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and FLUJO free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and FLUJO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and FLUJO?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and FLUJO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or FLUJO?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,202 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose FLUJO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.