head to head · open source

Cherry Studio vs FastGPT

Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars, 5,172 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FastGPT has 29,987 stars, 7,367 forks, 172 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 78% (53,242 vs 29,987 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; FastGPT is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, FastGPT 25%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cherry Studio ★ 53K FastGPT ★ 30K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cherry Studio FastGPT
GitHub stars ★ 53K ★ 30K
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-11-04
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 7.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cherry Studio if

  • You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cherry Studio profile →

pick FastGPT if

  • You want the FastGPT feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and FastGPT fits your workflow better

full FastGPT profile →

About Cherry Studio

English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…

read the full Cherry Studio overview →

About FastGPT

FastGPT English 简体中文 Bahasa Indonesia ไทย Tiếng Việt 日本語 FastGPT 是一个 AI Agent 构建平台,提供开箱即用的数据处理、模型调用等能力,同时可以通过 Flow 可视化进行工作流编排,从而实现复杂的应用场景。 快速开始 可以通过 Docker 快速启动 FastGPT,在终端输入以下命令,根据引导完成输入即可拉取配置。 bash 输入命令拉取配置文件 bash 💪 我们的项目 & 链接 快速开始本地开发 OpenAPI 文档 FastGPT plugin AI Proxy: 模型聚合负载均衡服务 Sealos:快速部署集群应用 🌿 第三方生态 AI Proxy:大模型聚合服务 SiliconCloud (硅基流动) —— 开源模型在线体验平台 🏘️ 社区交流群 扫码加入飞书话题群: 🤝 贡献者 我们非常欢迎各种形式的贡献。如果你对贡献代码感兴趣,可以查看我们的 GitHub Issues,大展身手,向我们展示你的奇思妙想。 🌟 Star History 使用协议 本仓库遵循 FastGPT Open Source License 开源协议。 1. 允许作为后台服务直接商用,但不允许提供 SaaS 服务。 2. 未经商业授权,任何形式的商用服务均需保留相关版权信息。 3. 完整请查看 FastGPT Open Source License 4…

read the full FastGPT overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cherry Studio or FastGPT more popular?

Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars and FastGPT has 29,987. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cherry Studio and FastGPT free?

Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and FastGPT has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Cherry Studio and FastGPT?

Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and FastGPT in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or FastGPT?

Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,242 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose FastGPT if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.