head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs catai
Cherry Studio has 53,173 GitHub stars, 5,156 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. catai has 498 stars, 39 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 12 months ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 10,577% (53,173 vs 498 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; catai is written in TypeScript under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, catai 8%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | catai | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 498 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2025-11-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 39 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick catai if
- You want the catai feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and catai fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About catai
Catai 🚀 Exciting Updates Coming Soon! New UI , Function Calling , and more amazing features are on the way! Stay tuned for updates. Run GGUF models on your computer with a chat ui. Your own AI assistant runs locally on your computer. Inspired by Node Llama Cpp, Llama.cpp Installation & Use Make sure you have Node.js ( download current ) installed. Features Auto detect programming language 🧑💻 Click on user icon to show original message 💬 Real time text streaming ⏱️ Fast model downloads 🚀 CLI Install command Cross platform You can use it on Windows, Linux and Mac. This package uses node llama cpp which…
read the full catai overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or catai more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,173 GitHub stars and catai has 498. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and catai free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and catai under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and catai?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and catai in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or catai?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,173 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose catai if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.