head to head · open source

chat vs xyne-spaces

chat has 13,515 GitHub stars, 2,078 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. xyne-spaces has 684 stars, 527 forks, 514 open issues and last shipped today. chat leads on adoption by 1,876% (13,515 vs 684 stars). chat is written in Go under GPL-3.0; xyne-spaces is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. chat has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, xyne-spaces 77%. xyne-spaces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

chat ★ 14K xyne-spaces ★ 684 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

chat xyne-spaces
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 684
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 527
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick chat if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full chat profile →

pick xyne-spaces if

  • You want the xyne-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and xyne-spaces fits your workflow better

full xyne-spaces profile →

About chat

Tinode is an open source, full stack instant messaging server that pairs a Go backend with native iOS, Android, web, and command line clients, built for developers and operators who want to run or federate their own messaging platform rather than rent one.

read the full chat overview →

About xyne-spaces

Xyne Spaces is an open source "AI Org OS" — an Apache 2.0, TypeScript collaboration platform that keeps an organization's context in one permission aware store and serves it back to both people and AI agents, making it a fit for teams that want human and agent work running over the same company knowledge rather than across a dozen disconnected tools.

read the full xyne-spaces overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 55K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

chat vs Plane chat vs Rocket.Chat chat vs cobalt chat vs Buzz chat vs Jitsi chat vs srs chat vs Huly chat vs Zulip chat vs etherpad chat vs univer chat vs drawnix chat vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is chat or xyne-spaces more popular?

chat has 13,515 GitHub stars and xyne-spaces has 684. chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are chat and xyne-spaces free?

Both are open source. chat is licensed under GPL-3.0 and xyne-spaces under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between chat and xyne-spaces?

chat is written in Go and xyne-spaces in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, chat or xyne-spaces?

Choose chat if you want the larger community (13,515 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose xyne-spaces if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.