head to head · open source
chat vs xyne-spaces
chat has 13,555 GitHub stars, 2,092 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. xyne-spaces has 826 stars, 575 forks, 514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chat leads on adoption by 1,541% (13,555 vs 826 stars). chat is written in Go under GPL-3.0; xyne-spaces is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. chat has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, xyne-spaces 70%. xyne-spaces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chat | xyne-spaces | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 14K | ★ 826 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-25 | 2026-11-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.1K | ⑂ 575 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chat if
- You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xyne-spaces if
- You want the xyne-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and xyne-spaces fits your workflow better
About chat
Tinode Instant Messaging Server Instant messaging full stack. Backend in pure Go (license GPL 3.0), clients for Android (Java), iOS (Swift), and web (ReactJS), as well as gRPC client support for C++, C , Go, Java, Node, PHP, Python, Ruby, Objective C, etc (all clients licensed under Apache 2.0). Wire transport is JSON over websocket (long polling is also available) or protobuf with gRPC. This is beta quality software: feature complete and stable but probably with a few bugs or missing features. Follow instructions to install and run or use one of the cloud services below. Read API documentation. Tinode is not…
About xyne-spaces
Xyne Spaces The org OS — your organization's context layer, with collaborative apps built around it. Real time, permission aware and built for agents. At the center: your org's context. Connectors bring in what your organization already knows — Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 and more — normalised into a store built for records and retrieval, and served back to your people and your agents through permission aware org context APIs, so every caller gets exactly the slice they're allowed to see. Around that core sit the org apps — Call · Claw · Agentic Search · Automations · Customer Support Desk · Chat ·…
read the full xyne-spaces overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chat or xyne-spaces more popular?
chat has 13,555 GitHub stars and xyne-spaces has 826. chat has the larger community by that measure.
Are chat and xyne-spaces free?
Both are open source. chat is licensed under GPL-3.0 and xyne-spaces under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chat and xyne-spaces?
chat is written in Go and xyne-spaces in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chat or xyne-spaces?
Choose chat if you want the larger community (13,555 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose xyne-spaces if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.