head to head · open source

chat vs octo-server

chat has 13,512 GitHub stars, 2,079 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. octo-server has 1,059 stars, 165 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. chat leads on adoption by 1,176% (13,512 vs 1,059 stars). chat is written in Go under GPL-3.0; octo-server is written in Go under Apache-2.0. chat has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, octo-server 16%. octo-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (chat, collaboration, go, golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

chat ★ 14K octo-server ★ 1.1K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

chat octo-server
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 1.1K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 165
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick chat if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full chat profile →

pick octo-server if

  • You want the octo-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and octo-server fits your workflow better

full octo-server profile →

About chat

Tinode is an open source, full stack instant messaging server that pairs a Go backend with native iOS, Android, web, and command line clients, built for developers and operators who want to run or federate their own messaging platform rather than rent one.

read the full chat overview →

About octo-server

octo server is the Go backend at the centre of OCTO, an open workplace built for humans and AI agents, and it is aimed at teams that want to self host a collaboration platform where Lobster agents participate in conversations as first class members.

read the full octo-server overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

chat vs Plane chat vs Rocket.Chat chat vs cobalt chat vs Buzz chat vs Jitsi chat vs srs chat vs Huly chat vs Zulip chat vs etherpad chat vs drawnix chat vs univer chat vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is chat or octo-server more popular?

chat has 13,512 GitHub stars and octo-server has 1,059. chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are chat and octo-server free?

Both are open source. chat is licensed under GPL-3.0 and octo-server under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between chat and octo-server?

chat is written in Go and octo-server in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, chat or octo-server?

Choose chat if you want the larger community (13,512 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose octo-server if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.