head to head · open source

chat vs hedgedoc

chat has 13,512 GitHub stars, 2,079 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. hedgedoc has 7,437 stars, 597 forks, 275 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chat leads on adoption by 82% (13,512 vs 7,437 stars). chat is written in Go under GPL-3.0; hedgedoc is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. chat has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, hedgedoc 8%. hedgedoc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

chat ★ 14K hedgedoc ★ 7.4K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

chat hedgedoc
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 7.4K
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 597
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick chat if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full chat profile →

pick hedgedoc if

  • You want the hedgedoc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and hedgedoc fits your workflow better

full hedgedoc profile →

About chat

Tinode is an open source, full stack instant messaging server that pairs a Go backend with native iOS, Android, web, and command line clients, built for developers and operators who want to run or federate their own messaging platform rather than rent one.

read the full chat overview →

About hedgedoc

HedgeDoc is an open source, self hostable collaborative markdown notes application, written in TypeScript and licensed under AGPL 3.0, for teams and individuals who need several people editing the same document in a browser at the same time.

read the full hedgedoc overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

chat vs Plane chat vs Rocket.Chat chat vs cobalt chat vs Buzz chat vs Jitsi chat vs srs chat vs Huly chat vs Zulip chat vs etherpad chat vs drawnix chat vs univer chat vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is chat or hedgedoc more popular?

chat has 13,512 GitHub stars and hedgedoc has 7,437. chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are chat and hedgedoc free?

Both are open source. chat is licensed under GPL-3.0 and hedgedoc under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between chat and hedgedoc?

chat is written in Go and hedgedoc in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, chat or hedgedoc?

Choose chat if you want the larger community (13,512 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose hedgedoc if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.