head to head · open source

Certipy vs routinator

Certipy has 3,672 GitHub stars, 482 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. routinator has 573 stars, 86 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Certipy leads on adoption by 541% (3,672 vs 573 stars). Certipy is written in Python under MIT; routinator is written in Rust under BSD-3-Clause. Certipy has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, routinator 15%. routinator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (pki), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Certipy ★ 3.7K routinator ★ 573 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Certipy routinator
GitHub stars ★ 3.7K ★ 573
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-07-30 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 482 ⑂ 86
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Certipy if

  • You weight community size — 3.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Certipy profile →

pick routinator if

  • You want the routinator feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and routinator fits your workflow better

full routinator profile →

About Certipy

Certipy is an open source Python toolkit, published under the MIT licence on PyPI as certipy ad , for enumerating and abusing Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS), built for red teamers, penetration testers, and defenders who need to assess AD CS misconfigurations in Windows Active Directory environments.

read the full Certipy overview →

About routinator

Routinator 3000 is a free, open source RPKI Relying Party written in Rust that validates RPKI data and serves it to routers, aimed at network operators and engineers running BGP who need to check route origin authorisations.

read the full routinator overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Certipy vs Puter Certipy vs Mattermost Certipy vs Signal Certipy vs Ente Certipy vs Element Certipy vs Fluxer Certipy vs certificates Certipy vs Tuta Certipy vs Zen Certipy vs Cinny Certipy vs Stoat Certipy vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Certipy or routinator more popular?

Certipy has 3,672 GitHub stars and routinator has 573. Certipy has the larger community by that measure.

Are Certipy and routinator free?

Both are open source. Certipy is licensed under MIT and routinator under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Certipy and routinator?

Certipy is written in Python and routinator in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Certipy or routinator?

Choose Certipy if you want the larger community (3,672 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose routinator if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.