head to head · open source

certificates vs ejbca-ce

certificates has 8,885 GitHub stars, 597 forks, 299 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ejbca-ce has 952 stars, 160 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. certificates leads on adoption by 833% (8,885 vs 952 stars). certificates is written in Go under Apache-2.0; ejbca-ce is written in Java under LGPL-2.1. certificates has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, ejbca-ce 17%. certificates was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (pki), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

certificates ★ 8.9K ejbca-ce ★ 952 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

certificates ejbca-ce
GitHub stars ★ 8.9K ★ 952
License Apache-2.0 LGPL-2.1
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 597 ⑂ 160
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick certificates if

  • You weight community size — 8.9K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full certificates profile →

pick ejbca-ce if

  • You want the ejbca-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and ejbca-ce fits your workflow better

full ejbca-ce profile →

About certificates

step ca is an open source online certificate authority that issues X.509 and SSH certificates and runs as an ACME server, built for DevOps teams that need automated certificate management without a commercial PKI contract.

read the full certificates overview →

About ejbca-ce

EJBCA Community Edition is an LGPL licensed, Java based public key infrastructure and certificate authority package for anyone who wants to learn, test, or prototype certificate and PKI workflows without committing to a commercial PKI product.

read the full ejbca-ce overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

certificates vs Puter certificates vs Mattermost certificates vs Signal certificates vs Ente certificates vs Element certificates vs Fluxer certificates vs Tuta certificates vs Zen certificates vs Cinny certificates vs Certipy certificates vs Stoat certificates vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is certificates or ejbca-ce more popular?

certificates has 8,885 GitHub stars and ejbca-ce has 952. certificates has the larger community by that measure.

Are certificates and ejbca-ce free?

Both are open source. certificates is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ejbca-ce under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between certificates and ejbca-ce?

certificates is written in Go and ejbca-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, certificates or ejbca-ce?

Choose certificates if you want the larger community (8,885 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ejbca-ce if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.