head to head · open source

Cap vs Abby

Cap has 7,798 GitHub stars, 579 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Abby has 166 stars, 30 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 1.2 years ago. Cap leads on adoption by 4,598% (7,798 vs 166 stars). Cap is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Abby is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Cap has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Abby 18%. Cap was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cap ★ 7.8K Abby ★ 166 category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cap Abby
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 166
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2025-07-24
Forks ⑂ 579 ⑂ 30
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cap if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cap profile →

pick Abby if

  • You want the Abby feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Abby fits your workflow better

full Abby profile →

About Cap

Cap is a free, open source, self hosted CAPTCHA replacement that swaps visual puzzles for proof of work and instrumentation challenges, built for developers and site operators who want anti bot protection without shipping their visitors' data to a third party service.

read the full Cap overview →

About Abby

Abby is an open source, TypeScript feature management and A/B testing platform that pairs statically typed SDKs for core JavaScript, React, Next.js, Angular and Svelte with a dashboard the non developers on a team can use, aimed at developers who want feature flags and remote config without sending user data to a third party.

read the full Abby overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K

Related comparisons

infisical vs capjs infisical vs unleash infisical vs growthbook infisical vs flagsmith infisical vs flipt infisical vs cerbos infisical vs opengrep infisical vs altcha puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase

More Application Security projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Application Security field.

Cap vs Infisical Cap vs Unleash Cap vs GrowthBook Cap vs Flagsmith Cap vs Flipt Cap vs Cerbos Cap vs Opengrep Cap vs ALTCHA Cap vs mCaptcha Cap vs FeatBit Cap vs Featurevisor Cap vs Procaptcha

Frequently asked questions

Is Cap or Abby more popular?

Cap has 7,798 GitHub stars and Abby has 166. Cap has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cap and Abby free?

Both are open source. Cap has no licence declared in this registry, and Abby is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Cap and Abby?

Cap is written in JavaScript and Abby in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cap or Abby?

Choose Cap if you want the larger community (7,798 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Abby if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.