head to head · open source

Cap vs Featurevisor

Cap has 7,798 GitHub stars, 579 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Featurevisor has 808 stars, 38 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. Cap leads on adoption by 865% (7,798 vs 808 stars). Cap is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Featurevisor is written in TypeScript under MIT. Cap has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Featurevisor 5%. Cap was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cap ★ 7.8K Featurevisor ★ 808 category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cap Featurevisor
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 808
License Custom / other MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 579 ⑂ 38
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cap if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cap profile →

pick Featurevisor if

  • You want the Featurevisor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Featurevisor fits your workflow better

full Featurevisor profile →

About Cap

Cap is a free, open source, self hosted CAPTCHA replacement that swaps visual puzzles for proof of work and instrumentation challenges, built for developers and site operators who want anti bot protection without shipping their visitors' data to a third party service.

read the full Cap overview →

About Featurevisor

Featurevisor is an MIT licensed TypeScript project for feature management with GitOps. It lets developers manage feature flags, experiment variations, and remote configuration values declaratively inside a Git repository. The project lives in the GitOps feature management ecosystem, where Git is used to define product behavior and configuration.

read the full Featurevisor overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K

Related comparisons

infisical vs capjs infisical vs unleash infisical vs growthbook infisical vs flagsmith infisical vs flipt infisical vs cerbos infisical vs opengrep infisical vs altcha puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase

More Application Security projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Application Security field.

Cap vs Infisical Cap vs Unleash Cap vs GrowthBook Cap vs Flagsmith Cap vs Flipt Cap vs Cerbos Cap vs Opengrep Cap vs ALTCHA Cap vs mCaptcha Cap vs FeatBit Cap vs Procaptcha Cap vs Private Captcha

Frequently asked questions

Is Cap or Featurevisor more popular?

Cap has 7,798 GitHub stars and Featurevisor has 808. Cap has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cap and Featurevisor free?

Both are open source. Cap has no licence declared in this registry, and Featurevisor is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Cap and Featurevisor?

Cap is written in JavaScript and Featurevisor in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cap or Featurevisor?

Choose Cap if you want the larger community (7,798 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Featurevisor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.