head to head · open source
Calibre-Web-Automated vs Lingo.dev
Calibre-Web-Automated has 6,547 GitHub stars, 565 forks, 443 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. Lingo.dev has 5,402 stars, 811 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Calibre-Web-Automated leads on adoption by 21% (6,547 vs 5,402 stars). Calibre-Web-Automated is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; Lingo.dev is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Calibre-Web-Automated has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Lingo.dev 15%. Lingo.dev was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Calibre-Web-Automated | Lingo.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.5K | ★ 5.4K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-09 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 565 | ⑂ 811 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Calibre-Web-Automated if
- You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Lingo.dev if
- You want the Lingo.dev feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Lingo.dev fits your workflow better
About Calibre-Web-Automated
Calibre Web Automated (formerly Calibre Web Automator) Making Calibre Web your dream , all in one self hosted digital library solution. Supporting the Project ❤️ CWA is and always will be free and open source. If it makes your library life easier and you're able to support development, contributions go directly to: Testing hardware (ereader devices & tablets ect.) Development tools and infrastructure Coffee ☕ (lots of coffee) Quick Access Features 🪄 Releases 🆕 Roadmap 🛣️ How to Install: 📖 Quick Install 🚀 Docker Compose 🐋⭐(Recommended) Users Migrating from stock Calibre Web 🔄 Post Install Tasks 🏁 Default…
read the full Calibre-Web-Automated overview →
About Lingo.dev
Open source localization engineering tools. Connect to Lingo.dev localization engineering platform for consistent, quality translations. Lingo API • Lingo React MCP • Lingo CLI • Lingo GitHub Action • Lingo Compiler for React (Early alpha) Quick Start Localization engines These tools connect to localization engines – stateful translation APIs you create on the Lingo.dev localization engineering platform. Each engine persists glossaries, brand voice, and per locale instructions across every request, reducing terminology errors 16.6–44.6%. Or bring your own LLM. Lingo.dev MCP Setting up i18n in React apps is error…
read the full Lingo.dev overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Publishing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Calibre-Web-Automated or Lingo.dev more popular?
Calibre-Web-Automated has 6,547 GitHub stars and Lingo.dev has 5,402. Calibre-Web-Automated has the larger community by that measure.
Are Calibre-Web-Automated and Lingo.dev free?
Both are open source. Calibre-Web-Automated is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Lingo.dev under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Calibre-Web-Automated and Lingo.dev?
Calibre-Web-Automated is written in JavaScript and Lingo.dev in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Calibre-Web-Automated or Lingo.dev?
Choose Calibre-Web-Automated if you want the larger community (6,547 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Lingo.dev if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.