head to head · open source
Buzz vs teamtype
Buzz has 33,547 GitHub stars, 4,395 forks, 3,556 open issues and last shipped today. teamtype has 1,920 stars, 54 forks, 113 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Buzz leads on adoption by 1,647% (33,547 vs 1,920 stars). Buzz is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; teamtype is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Buzz has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, teamtype 3%. Buzz was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Buzz | teamtype | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 34K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Rust | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 54 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Buzz if
- You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick teamtype if
- You want the teamtype feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and teamtype fits your workflow better
About Buzz
Buzz is a self hostable workspace platform where humans and AI agents collaborate in shared rooms, using a single Nostr based event log as the underlying data model. It unifies team chat, project management, and agent automation into one coherent interface, replacing fragmented tools with a unified protocol for events like messages, code patches, CI results, workflow steps, and approvals. Built in Rust and licensed under Apache 2.0, it runs as a single relay deployment per community or as a multi tenant hosted service sharing infrastructure while preserving strict community boundaries.
About teamtype
Multiplayer mode for your text editor! For complete end user documentation see the [Teamtype Documentation][docs] site. [!NOTE] Until October 2025, this project was known as "Ethersync". The motivation for the rename was explained in this PR. Teamtype enables real time peer to peer collaborative editing of local files using your own text editor or other tools. For example, you can use it for pair programming sessions, brainstorming, or note taking. It's the missing real time complement to Git and other version control systems! Features 👥 Edit files concurrently by multiple users using different text editors 📍 S…
read the full teamtype overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Buzz or teamtype more popular?
Buzz has 33,547 GitHub stars and teamtype has 1,920. Buzz has the larger community by that measure.
Are Buzz and teamtype free?
Both are open source. Buzz is licensed under Apache-2.0 and teamtype under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Buzz and teamtype?
Buzz is written in Rust and teamtype in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Buzz or teamtype?
Choose Buzz if you want the larger community (33,547 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose teamtype if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.