head to head · open source

Better Auth vs django-allauth

Better Auth has 30,553 GitHub stars, 3,052 forks, 723 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. django-allauth has 10,383 stars, 3,107 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Better Auth leads on adoption by 194% (30,553 vs 10,383 stars). Better Auth is written in TypeScript under MIT; django-allauth is written in Python under MIT. Better Auth has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, django-allauth 30%. Better Auth was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (authentication, oauth2), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Better Auth ★ 31K django-allauth ★ 10K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Better Auth django-allauth
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 10K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-11-01 2026-10-30
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 3.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Better Auth if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Better Auth profile →

pick django-allauth if

  • You want the django-allauth feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and django-allauth fits your workflow better

full django-allauth profile →

About Better Auth

Discord · Website · Issues Better Auth Better Auth is a framework agnostic authentication (and authorization) framework for TypeScript. It provides a comprehensive set of features out of the box and includes a plugin ecosystem that simplifies adding advanced functionalities with minimal code in a short amount of time. Whether you need 2FA, multi tenant support, or other complex features, it lets you focus on building your actual application instead of reinventing the wheel. Why Better Auth Authentication in the TypeScript ecosystem is a half solved problem. Other open source libraries often require a lot of…

read the full Better Auth overview →

About django-allauth

========================== Welcome to django allauth! ========================== .. image:: :target: :align: right :alt: django allauth logo :width: 250px .. ci image:: :target: .. pypi image:: :target: .. cov image:: :alt: Coverage Status :target: .. btc image:: :target: .. liberapay image:: :target: .. pystyle image:: :target: .. jsstyle image:: :target: .. editor image:: :target: .. i18n image:: :target: .. pypidl image:: :target: :alt: PyPI Downloads .. djangodemo image:: :target: :alt: View Django Demo .. reactdemo image:: :target: :alt: View React SPA Demo Integrated set of Django applications addressing…

read the full django-allauth overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Related comparisons

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Better Auth or django-allauth more popular?

Better Auth has 30,553 GitHub stars and django-allauth has 10,383. Better Auth has the larger community by that measure.

Are Better Auth and django-allauth free?

Both are open source. Better Auth is licensed under MIT and django-allauth under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Better Auth and django-allauth?

Better Auth is written in TypeScript and django-allauth in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Better Auth or django-allauth?

Choose Better Auth if you want the larger community (30,553 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose django-allauth if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.