head to head · open source

beelzebub vs coi

beelzebub has 2,188 GitHub stars, 213 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. coi has 732 stars, 64 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped yesterday. beelzebub leads on adoption by 199% (2,188 vs 732 stars). beelzebub is written in Go under GPL-3.0; coi is written in Go under MIT. beelzebub has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, coi 9%. coi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

beelzebub ★ 2.2K coi ★ 732 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

beelzebub coi
GitHub stars ★ 2.2K ★ 732
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-28 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 213 ⑂ 64
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick beelzebub if

  • You weight community size — 2.2K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full beelzebub profile →

pick coi if

  • You want the coi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and coi fits your workflow better

full coi profile →

About beelzebub

Beelzebub is an open source deception runtime framework written in Go and released under GPL 3.0. It operates in the cybersecurity and AI security ecosystem, where teams need controlled systems that attract and record activity aimed at decoy services. The project is a configurable runtime for honeypots, decoys, and agent facing bait tools, with documentation at docs.beelzebub.ai.

read the full beelzebub overview →

About coi

Coi (Code on Incus) is an MIT licensed Go tool that gives each AI coding agent its own isolated Incus system container — a full Linux machine with root, systemd, and Docker — for developers who want agents to work like they would on a real server without exposing the host or its credentials.

read the full coi overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 391K Hermes Agent ★ 250K Ollama ★ 182K Dify ★ 158K Open WebUI ★ 154K ponytail ★ 149K

Related comparisons

strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs ifixai strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

beelzebub vs strix beelzebub vs shannon beelzebub vs SkillSpector beelzebub vs iFixAi beelzebub vs codex-security beelzebub vs garak beelzebub vs AI-Infra-Guard beelzebub vs giskard-oss beelzebub vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter beelzebub vs nono beelzebub vs CyberStrike beelzebub vs AiSOC

Frequently asked questions

Is beelzebub or coi more popular?

beelzebub has 2,188 GitHub stars and coi has 732. beelzebub has the larger community by that measure.

Are beelzebub and coi free?

Both are open source. beelzebub is licensed under GPL-3.0 and coi under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between beelzebub and coi?

beelzebub is written in Go and coi in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, beelzebub or coi?

Choose beelzebub if you want the larger community (2,188 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose coi if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.