head to head · open source

Appwrite vs Bear

Appwrite has 57,418 GitHub stars, 5,732 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bear has 6,493 stars, 369 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 784% (57,418 vs 6,493 stars). Appwrite is written in PHP under BSD-3-Clause; Bear is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Bear 6%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Appwrite ★ 57K Bear ★ 6.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Appwrite Bear
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 6.5K
License BSD-3-Clause GPL-3.0
Written in PHP Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 369
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Appwrite if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Appwrite profile →

pick Bear if

  • You want the Bear feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Bear fits your workflow better

full Bear profile →

About Appwrite

Appwrite is an open source backend platform that consolidates infrastructure services—authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, hosting, and real time capabilities—into a single, unified system. It runs as a self hosted service or via a managed cloud offering (Appwrite Cloud), targeting developers who want to avoid assembling and maintaining disparate backend tools.

read the full Appwrite overview →

About Bear

Bear is a GPL 3.0, Rust based command line tool that produces a compile commands.json compilation database for any C or C++ build by recording the compiler invocations that run during it, and it is aimed at developers, code explorers, and CI jobs whose build systems cannot emit that database on their own.

read the full Bear overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

supabase vs appwrite vite vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs harness react vs vite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs parcel openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Appwrite vs vite Appwrite vs webpack Appwrite vs parcel Appwrite vs esbuild Appwrite vs Harness Appwrite vs Dokku Appwrite vs turborepo Appwrite vs nx Appwrite vs NocoBase Appwrite vs gradle Appwrite vs rspack Appwrite vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is Appwrite or Bear more popular?

Appwrite has 57,418 GitHub stars and Bear has 6,493. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.

Are Appwrite and Bear free?

Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Bear under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Appwrite and Bear?

Appwrite is written in PHP and Bear in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Appwrite or Bear?

Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,418 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose Bear if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.