head to head · open source
AutomatedLab vs ejbca-ce
AutomatedLab has 2,235 GitHub stars, 382 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. ejbca-ce has 967 stars, 166 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. AutomatedLab leads on adoption by 131% (2,235 vs 967 stars). AutomatedLab is written in PowerShell under MIT; ejbca-ce is written in Java under LGPL-2.1. AutomatedLab has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, ejbca-ce 17%. ejbca-ce was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (pki), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AutomatedLab | ejbca-ce | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 2.2K | ★ 967 |
| License | MIT | LGPL-2.1 |
| Written in | PowerShell | Java |
| Last push | 2026-07-06 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 382 | ⑂ 166 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AutomatedLab if
- You weight community size — 2.2K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PowerShell
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ejbca-ce if
- You want the ejbca-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and ejbca-ce fits your workflow better
About AutomatedLab
AutomatedLab Build Status Last Commit Latest Release Develop Master Project Summary AutomatedLab (AL) enables you to setup test and lab environments on Hyper v or Azure with multiple products or just a single VM in a very short time. There are only two requirements you need to make sure: You need the DVD ISO images and a Hyper V host or an Azure subscription. Sponsors Huge thanks to our regular sponsor @chocolatey! In case you have lived under a rock (or worked mainly on non Windows systems) for the past decade, Chocolatey is a brilliant package management system with a public binary package gallery as well as…
read the full AutomatedLab overview →
About ejbca-ce
EJBCA Community Note: We take the security of EJBCA and the trust of our users seriously. If you believe you have identified a security vulnerability in EJBCA, please report it responsibly by contacting us at security@primekey.com. EJBCA Community Edition is not intended for production use. For PKI production deployments, use Keyfactor EJBCA Enterprise Edition. Welcome to the EJBCA Community EJBCA is a public key infrastructure (PKI) and certificate authority (CA) solution and one of the longest running CA software projects. It is platform independent and covers the full certificate lifecycle, from enrollment…
read the full ejbca-ce overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Data Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AutomatedLab or ejbca-ce more popular?
AutomatedLab has 2,235 GitHub stars and ejbca-ce has 967. AutomatedLab has the larger community by that measure.
Are AutomatedLab and ejbca-ce free?
Both are open source. AutomatedLab is licensed under MIT and ejbca-ce under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AutomatedLab and ejbca-ce?
AutomatedLab is written in PowerShell and ejbca-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AutomatedLab or ejbca-ce?
Choose AutomatedLab if you want the larger community (2,235 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ejbca-ce if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.