head to head · open source

Automa vs flowgram.ai

Automa has 21,705 GitHub stars, 2,344 forks, 377 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. flowgram.ai has 8,551 stars, 783 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Automa leads on adoption by 154% (21,705 vs 8,551 stars). Automa is written in Vue under a custom or non-standard licence; flowgram.ai is written in TypeScript under MIT. Automa has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, flowgram.ai 9%. flowgram.ai was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (automation, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Automa ★ 22K flowgram.ai ★ 8.6K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Automa flowgram.ai
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 8.6K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Vue TypeScript
Last push 2026-03-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 783
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Automa if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Automa profile →

pick flowgram.ai if

  • You want the flowgram.ai feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and flowgram.ai fits your workflow better

full flowgram.ai profile →

About Automa

Automa An extension for automating your browser by connecting blocks. Auto fill forms, do a repetitive task, take a screenshot, or scrape website data — the choice is yours. You can even schedule when the automation will execute! Downloads Chrome Web Store Firefox Add ons Marketplace Browse the Automa marketplace where you can share and download workflows with others. Go to the marketplace & 187; Automa Chrome Extension Builder Automa Chrome Extension Builder (Automa CEB for short) allows you to generate a standalone chrome extension based on Automa workflows. Go to the documentation & 187; Project setup Before…

read the full Automa overview →

About flowgram.ai

FlowGram|Workflow development framework English 中文 Español Русский Português Deutsch 日本語 FlowGram is a composable, visual, easy to integrate, and extensible workflow development framework & toolkit. Our goal is to help developers build AI workflow platforms faster and simpler . FlowGram comes with a suite of built in tools for workflow development: flow canvas, node configuration form, variable scope chain, and ready to use materials (LLM, Condition, Code Editor etc). It’s not a ready made workflow platform; it’s the framework and toolkit to build yours. Learn more at FlowGram.AI 🌐 🎬 Demo Open in CodeSandbox…

read the full flowgram.ai overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Automa or flowgram.ai more popular?

Automa has 21,705 GitHub stars and flowgram.ai has 8,551. Automa has the larger community by that measure.

Are Automa and flowgram.ai free?

Both are open source. Automa has no licence declared in this registry, and flowgram.ai is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Automa and flowgram.ai?

Automa is written in Vue and flowgram.ai in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Automa or flowgram.ai?

Choose Automa if you want the larger community (21,705 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose flowgram.ai if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.