head to head · open source

Automa vs flowgram.ai

Automa has 21,624 GitHub stars, 2,340 forks, 377 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. flowgram.ai has 8,454 stars, 769 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. Automa leads on adoption by 156% (21,624 vs 8,454 stars). Automa is written in Vue under a custom or non-standard licence; flowgram.ai is written in TypeScript under MIT. Automa has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, flowgram.ai 9%. flowgram.ai was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (automation, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Automa ★ 22K flowgram.ai ★ 8.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Automa flowgram.ai
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 8.5K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Vue TypeScript
Last push 2026-03-02 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 769
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Automa if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Automa profile →

pick flowgram.ai if

  • You want the flowgram.ai feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and flowgram.ai fits your workflow better

full flowgram.ai profile →

About Automa

Automa browser extension. Automate browser by connect blocks. Vue project. Chrome and Firefox ecosystem. Problem: repeat browser tasks take time. User make workflow with blocks. No code write. Workflows do form fill, repetitive task, screenshot, scrape website data. Can schedule when automation execute. Marketplace share and download workflow. Automa Chrome Extension Builder make standalone Chrome extension from Automa workflow. Project lives as browser extension, not hosted automation service. The project also lists Chrome and Firefox extension downloads.

read the full Automa overview →

About flowgram.ai

FlowGram is an MIT licensed TypeScript framework and toolkit that gives developers a free or fixed layout canvas, a node configuration form engine, a variable scope chain, and ready to use materials such as LLM, Condition, and Code Editor nodes so they can build their own AI workflow platforms faster and simpler.

read the full flowgram.ai overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs automa n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Automa vs n8n Automa vs Browser Use Automa vs frigate Automa vs Lightpanda Automa vs ProxmoxVE Automa vs ActivePieces Automa vs Skyvern Automa vs LiveKit Automa vs amis Automa vs Windmill Automa vs Botpress Automa vs mitosis

Frequently asked questions

Is Automa or flowgram.ai more popular?

Automa has 21,624 GitHub stars and flowgram.ai has 8,454. Automa has the larger community by that measure.

Are Automa and flowgram.ai free?

Both are open source. Automa has no licence declared in this registry, and flowgram.ai is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Automa and flowgram.ai?

Automa is written in Vue and flowgram.ai in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Automa or flowgram.ai?

Choose Automa if you want the larger community (21,624 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose flowgram.ai if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.