head to head · open source
artex-global vs pojia-next
artex-global has 2,532 GitHub stars, 2,521 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. pojia-next has 1,004 stars, 271 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped yesterday. artex-global leads on adoption by 152% (2,532 vs 1,004 stars). artex-global is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; pojia-next is written in Python under MIT. artex-global has attracted 100% as many forks as stars, pojia-next 27%. pojia-next was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agent), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| artex-global | pojia-next | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 2.5K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-14 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.5K | ⑂ 271 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick artex-global if
- You weight community size — 2.5K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pojia-next if
- You want the pojia-next feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and pojia-next fits your workflow better
About artex-global
ARTEX — Global Edition An autonomous penetration testing system driven by LLM multi agents (Go backend + Next.js frontend) The UI and generated output default to English, and can be switched to Korean, Chinese, Spanish or Japanese in Settings (System → Settings → Display language). Changing the language also changes the language of agent generated reports, summaries and chat replies. English · 한국어 · 中文 · Español · 日本語 🚨 Security & misuse warning — read this first This repository is published for use only within authorized environments, and only to build defensive and detection capabilities. ARTEX is an…
read the full artex-global overview →
About pojia-next
破甲一键通 一句话：把你电脑上那几个 AI 客户端「自己改不到的内置提示词」，换成你自己写的那份 —— 双击 exe、点一个按钮的事。 支持 DSH / WorkBuddy / ZCode / Codex / Cursor / Claude Code / Gemini CLI / Qwen Code / iFlow / Trae / CodeBuddy / OpenCode / Windsurf / Cline / Copilot CLI 十五个客户端，一个工具全管，口径完全一致。 图形界面（原生窗口）+ 单文件 exe ：不装 Python、不敲命令、不进浏览器； 仓库只发成品 exe（Release 附件），源码不再随仓库分发。 🚨 一句话警告：本项目 完全免费 第三方发布的「 WKBD rev1.0 / rev2.0 」（化名 popopo ）是基于本项目 换皮二次发布 ， 且把 MIT 强制保留的版权声明删空成 Copyright (c) 2026 。 如果你花钱买了它，请立即退款 —— 完整证据与自助验证方法见 反抄袭通告。 🧭 30 秒看懂：这是干什么的？ 你平时用的 AI 客户端（比如 WorkBuddy、DSH），每次对话时都会在背后塞一段 你自己改不到的"规矩" —— 用来告诉 AI 它是什么身份、该守什么、什么不做什么能做。 这个工具做的事很简单： 把那段规矩，换成你自己写的一份。…
read the full pojia-next overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is artex-global or pojia-next more popular?
artex-global has 2,532 GitHub stars and pojia-next has 1,004. artex-global has the larger community by that measure.
Are artex-global and pojia-next free?
Both are open source. artex-global is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pojia-next under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between artex-global and pojia-next?
artex-global is written in Go and pojia-next in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, artex-global or pojia-next?
Choose artex-global if you want the larger community (2,532 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pojia-next if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.