head to head · open source

ArchiveBox vs stagehand

ArchiveBox has 28,553 GitHub stars, 1,604 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. stagehand has 24,682 stars, 1,702 forks, 376 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ArchiveBox leads on adoption by 16% (28,553 vs 24,682 stars). ArchiveBox is written in Python under MIT; stagehand is written in TypeScript under MIT. ArchiveBox has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, stagehand 7%. ArchiveBox was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ArchiveBox ★ 29K stagehand ★ 25K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ArchiveBox stagehand
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 25K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ArchiveBox if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ArchiveBox profile →

pick stagehand if

  • You want the stagehand feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and stagehand fits your workflow better

full stagehand profile →

About ArchiveBox

ArchiveBox is an open source, self hosted web archiving application that lets individuals and organizations preserve public and private web content in durable, readable formats while keeping control of their own data.

read the full ArchiveBox overview →

About stagehand

Stagehand is the MIT licensed SDK for extracting data and interacting with any site on the web, available in TypeScript, Python, and Go, and aimed at developers building AI agents that need to drive a browser the way a person does rather than at engineers writing test suites.

read the full stagehand overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 83K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

ArchiveBox vs Browser Use ArchiveBox vs Crawl4AI ArchiveBox vs Scrapling ArchiveBox vs scrapy ArchiveBox vs EasySpider ArchiveBox vs Lightpanda ArchiveBox vs changedetection.io ArchiveBox vs lux ArchiveBox vs CloakBrowser ArchiveBox vs Scrapegraph-ai ArchiveBox vs page-agent ArchiveBox vs crawlee

Frequently asked questions

Is ArchiveBox or stagehand more popular?

ArchiveBox has 28,553 GitHub stars and stagehand has 24,682. ArchiveBox has the larger community by that measure.

Are ArchiveBox and stagehand free?

Both are open source. ArchiveBox is licensed under MIT and stagehand under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ArchiveBox and stagehand?

ArchiveBox is written in Python and stagehand in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ArchiveBox or stagehand?

Choose ArchiveBox if you want the larger community (28,553 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose stagehand if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.