head to head · open source
ArchiveBox vs puppeteer-sharp
ArchiveBox has 28,927 GitHub stars, 1,626 forks, 158 open issues and last shipped today. puppeteer-sharp has 3,932 stars, 483 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. ArchiveBox leads on adoption by 636% (28,927 vs 3,932 stars). ArchiveBox is written in Python under MIT; puppeteer-sharp is written in C# under MIT. ArchiveBox has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, puppeteer-sharp 12%. ArchiveBox was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chromium), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ArchiveBox | puppeteer-sharp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 483 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ArchiveBox if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick puppeteer-sharp if
- You want the puppeteer-sharp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and puppeteer-sharp fits your workflow better
About ArchiveBox
ArchiveBox Open source self hosted web archiving. ▶️ Quickstart Demo GitHub Documentation Info & Motivation Community ArchiveBox is a self hosted app that lets you preserve content from websites in a variety of formats. We aim to make your data immediately useful, and kept in formats that other programs can read directly. As output, we save standard HTML, PNG, PDF, TXT, JSON, WARC, SQLite, all guaranteed to be readable for decades to come. ArchiveBox also has a CLI, REST API, and webhooks so you can set up integrations with other services. Without active preservation effort, everything on the internet eventually…
read the full ArchiveBox overview →
About puppeteer-sharp
Puppeteer Sharp [ ][NugetUrl] [ ][BuildUrl] [ ][BuildDemoUrl] [ ][Backers] [NugetUrl]: [BuildUrl]: [BuildDemoUrl]: [Backers]: Puppeteer Sharp is a .NET port of the official Node.JS Puppeteer API. Recent news Test the latest Firefox versions using WebDriver BiDi! Check the PuppeteerSharp 21 release notes. PuppeteerSharp now supports AOT compilation! Check the PuppeteerSharp 19 release notes!. Useful links API Documentation Slack channel puppeteer sharp StackOverflow Issues Blog Published Packages Prerequisites Puppeteer Sharp comes in two flavors: a NetStandard 2.0 library for .NET Framework 4.6.1 and .NET Core…
read the full puppeteer-sharp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ArchiveBox or puppeteer-sharp more popular?
ArchiveBox has 28,927 GitHub stars and puppeteer-sharp has 3,932. ArchiveBox has the larger community by that measure.
Are ArchiveBox and puppeteer-sharp free?
Both are open source. ArchiveBox is licensed under MIT and puppeteer-sharp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ArchiveBox and puppeteer-sharp?
ArchiveBox is written in Python and puppeteer-sharp in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ArchiveBox or puppeteer-sharp?
Choose ArchiveBox if you want the larger community (28,927 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose puppeteer-sharp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.