head to head · open source
Appwrite vs zeabur
Appwrite has 57,854 GitHub stars, 5,830 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zeabur has 735 stars, 114 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 7,771% (57,854 vs 735 stars). Appwrite is written in TypeScript under BSD-3-Clause; zeabur is written in HTML under MPL-2.0. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, zeabur 16%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Appwrite | zeabur | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 58K | ★ 735 |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MPL-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.8K | ⑂ 114 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Appwrite if
- You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick zeabur if
- You want the zeabur feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and zeabur fits your workflow better
About Appwrite
Appwrite Appwrite is an open source, all in one development platform. Use built in backend infrastructure and web hosting, all from a single place. English 简体中文 Appwrite is an open source development platform for building web, mobile, and AI applications. It brings together backend infrastructure and web hosting in one place, so teams can build, ship, and scale without stitching together a fragmented stack. Appwrite is available as a managed cloud platform and can also be self hosted on infrastructure you control. With Appwrite, you can add authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, realtime…
read the full Appwrite overview →
About zeabur
Home · Documentation · Templates · Forum · Discord Your AI DevOps Engineer Zeabur handles all your deployment work so you can focus on your code. Tell your AI agent what you need — Zeabur deploys services, rents servers, manages domains, configures databases, and troubleshoots issues, all through natural language. No DevOps expertise required. Features AI Native Development Zeabur is built for AI centric workflows — deploy and operate your infrastructure directly from your AI tools. Claude Code Plugin — Zeabur's official Claude Code plugin converts natural language into infrastructure operations. Rent servers…
read the full zeabur overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Appwrite or zeabur more popular?
Appwrite has 57,854 GitHub stars and zeabur has 735. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.
Are Appwrite and zeabur free?
Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and zeabur under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Appwrite and zeabur?
Appwrite is written in TypeScript and zeabur in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Appwrite or zeabur?
Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,854 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose zeabur if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.