head to head · open source

Appwrite vs xmake

Appwrite has 57,400 GitHub stars, 5,725 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xmake has 12,220 stars, 954 forks, 255 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 370% (57,400 vs 12,220 stars). Appwrite is written in PHP under BSD-3-Clause; xmake is written in Lua under Apache-2.0. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, xmake 8%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Appwrite ★ 57K xmake ★ 12K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Appwrite xmake
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 12K
License BSD-3-Clause Apache-2.0
Written in PHP Lua
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 954
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Appwrite if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Appwrite profile →

pick xmake if

  • You want the xmake feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and xmake fits your workflow better

full xmake profile →

About Appwrite

Appwrite is an open source backend platform that consolidates infrastructure services—authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, hosting, and real time capabilities—into a single, unified system. It runs as a self hosted service or via a managed cloud offering (Appwrite Cloud), targeting developers who want to avoid assembling and maintaining disparate backend tools.

read the full Appwrite overview →

About xmake

Xmake is a cross platform build utility and package manager, written in Lua and licensed under Apache 2.0, that takes a single xmake.lua project file and turns it into builds for desktop, mobile, BSD, Wasm and other targets — it is aimed at C, C++, Objective C and mixed toolchain developers who want Make/Ninja style building, CMake/Meson style project generation, and Vcpkg/Conan style dependency handling from one tool.

read the full xmake overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Appwrite vs vite Appwrite vs webpack Appwrite vs parcel Appwrite vs Harness Appwrite vs Dokku Appwrite vs turborepo Appwrite vs nx Appwrite vs NocoBase Appwrite vs gradle Appwrite vs rspack Appwrite vs devbox Appwrite vs chalice

Frequently asked questions

Is Appwrite or xmake more popular?

Appwrite has 57,400 GitHub stars and xmake has 12,220. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.

Are Appwrite and xmake free?

Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and xmake under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Appwrite and xmake?

Appwrite is written in PHP and xmake in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Appwrite or xmake?

Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,400 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose xmake if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.