head to head · open source

Appwrite vs sbt

Appwrite has 57,400 GitHub stars, 5,725 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sbt has 4,952 stars, 1,046 forks, 498 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 1,059% (57,400 vs 4,952 stars). Appwrite is written in PHP under BSD-3-Clause; sbt is written in Scala under Apache-2.0. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, sbt 21%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Appwrite ★ 57K sbt ★ 5.0K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Appwrite sbt
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 5.0K
License BSD-3-Clause Apache-2.0
Written in PHP Scala
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 1.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Appwrite if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Appwrite profile →

pick sbt if

  • You want the sbt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Scala
  • You evaluated both and sbt fits your workflow better

full sbt profile →

About Appwrite

Appwrite is an open source backend platform that consolidates infrastructure services—authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, hosting, and real time capabilities—into a single, unified system. It runs as a self hosted service or via a managed cloud offering (Appwrite Cloud), targeting developers who want to avoid assembling and maintaining disparate backend tools.

read the full Appwrite overview →

About sbt

sbt is an interactive build tool for Scala, Java, and more. It lives in the Scala ecosystem and is maintained under the Apache 2.0 license at scala sbt.org. The sbt/sbt repository hosts the build tool modules, while related code is split across sbt/io and sbt/zinc. It is categorized as Developer Tools / Build & Deployment.

read the full sbt overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Appwrite vs vite Appwrite vs webpack Appwrite vs parcel Appwrite vs Harness Appwrite vs Dokku Appwrite vs turborepo Appwrite vs nx Appwrite vs NocoBase Appwrite vs gradle Appwrite vs rspack Appwrite vs devbox Appwrite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is Appwrite or sbt more popular?

Appwrite has 57,400 GitHub stars and sbt has 4,952. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.

Are Appwrite and sbt free?

Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and sbt under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Appwrite and sbt?

Appwrite is written in PHP and sbt in Scala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Appwrite or sbt?

Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,400 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose sbt if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.