head to head · open source
Appwrite vs sbt
Appwrite has 57,854 GitHub stars, 5,830 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sbt has 4,953 stars, 1,053 forks, 498 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 1,068% (57,854 vs 4,953 stars). Appwrite is written in TypeScript under BSD-3-Clause; sbt is written in Scala under Apache-2.0. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, sbt 21%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Appwrite | sbt | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 58K | ★ 5.0K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Scala |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.8K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Appwrite if
- You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick sbt if
- You want the sbt feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Scala
- You evaluated both and sbt fits your workflow better
About Appwrite
Appwrite Appwrite is an open source, all in one development platform. Use built in backend infrastructure and web hosting, all from a single place. English 简体中文 Appwrite is an open source development platform for building web, mobile, and AI applications. It brings together backend infrastructure and web hosting in one place, so teams can build, ship, and scale without stitching together a fragmented stack. Appwrite is available as a managed cloud platform and can also be self hosted on infrastructure you control. With Appwrite, you can add authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, realtime…
read the full Appwrite overview →
About sbt
[sbt/sbt zero seven]: [CONTRIBUTING]: CONTRIBUTING.md [contributing docs]: contributing docs/README.md [Setup]: [FAQ]: [sbt dev]: [searching]: [asking]: [LICENSE]: LICENSE [sbt/io]: [sbt/zinc]: [sbt/sbt]: sbt === sbt is a build tool for Scala, Java, and more. For general documentation, see sbt 2.x This is the 2.x series of sbt. The source code of sbt is split across several GitHub repositories, including this one. [sbt/io][sbt/io] hosts sbt.io module. [sbt/zinc][sbt/zinc] hosts Zinc, an incremental compiler for Scala. [sbt/sbt][sbt/sbt], this repository hosts modules that implement the build tool. Other links…
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Appwrite or sbt more popular?
Appwrite has 57,854 GitHub stars and sbt has 4,953. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.
Are Appwrite and sbt free?
Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and sbt under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Appwrite and sbt?
Appwrite is written in TypeScript and sbt in Scala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Appwrite or sbt?
Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,854 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose sbt if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.