head to head · open source

Appwrite vs piku

Appwrite has 57,400 GitHub stars, 5,725 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. piku has 6,605 stars, 157 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 769% (57,400 vs 6,605 stars). Appwrite is written in PHP under BSD-3-Clause; piku is written in Python under MIT. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, piku 2%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Appwrite ★ 57K piku ★ 6.6K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Appwrite piku
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 6.6K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in PHP Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-04
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 157
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Appwrite if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Appwrite profile →

pick piku if

  • You want the piku feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and piku fits your workflow better

full piku profile →

About Appwrite

Appwrite is an open source backend platform that consolidates infrastructure services—authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, hosting, and real time capabilities—into a single, unified system. It runs as a self hosted service or via a managed cloud offering (Appwrite Cloud), targeting developers who want to avoid assembling and maintaining disparate backend tools.

read the full Appwrite overview →

About piku

piku is a small, MIT licensed platform as a service tool written in Python that lets developers deploy applications to their own servers with a git push , and it is aimed at people who want a Heroku like workflow on hardware as modest as a Raspberry Pi.

read the full piku overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Appwrite vs vite Appwrite vs webpack Appwrite vs parcel Appwrite vs Harness Appwrite vs Dokku Appwrite vs turborepo Appwrite vs nx Appwrite vs NocoBase Appwrite vs gradle Appwrite vs rspack Appwrite vs devbox Appwrite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is Appwrite or piku more popular?

Appwrite has 57,400 GitHub stars and piku has 6,605. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.

Are Appwrite and piku free?

Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and piku under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Appwrite and piku?

Appwrite is written in PHP and piku in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Appwrite or piku?

Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,400 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose piku if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.