head to head · open source

Appwrite vs farm

Appwrite has 57,400 GitHub stars, 5,725 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. farm has 5,588 stars, 190 forks, 211 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 927% (57,400 vs 5,588 stars). Appwrite is written in PHP under BSD-3-Clause; farm is written in Rust under MIT. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, farm 3%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Appwrite ★ 57K farm ★ 5.6K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Appwrite farm
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 5.6K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in PHP Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-14
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 190
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Appwrite if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Appwrite profile →

pick farm if

  • You want the farm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and farm fits your workflow better

full farm profile →

About Appwrite

Appwrite is an open source backend platform that consolidates infrastructure services—authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, hosting, and real time capabilities—into a single, unified system. It runs as a self hosted service or via a managed cloud offering (Appwrite Cloud), targeting developers who want to avoid assembling and maintaining disparate backend tools.

read the full Appwrite overview →

About farm

Farm is a web build tool written in Rust and distributed under the MIT license. It lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside bundlers such as webpack and Vite, and it is designed to be compatible with Vite so that existing plugins can be reused. The project is hosted on GitHub, has reached a 1.0 stable release that the README describes as production ready, and ships with documentation and an online playground at farmfe.org.

read the full farm overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Appwrite vs vite Appwrite vs webpack Appwrite vs parcel Appwrite vs Harness Appwrite vs Dokku Appwrite vs turborepo Appwrite vs nx Appwrite vs NocoBase Appwrite vs gradle Appwrite vs rspack Appwrite vs devbox Appwrite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is Appwrite or farm more popular?

Appwrite has 57,400 GitHub stars and farm has 5,588. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.

Are Appwrite and farm free?

Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and farm under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Appwrite and farm?

Appwrite is written in PHP and farm in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Appwrite or farm?

Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,400 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose farm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.