head to head · open source

Appwrite vs erlang.mk

Appwrite has 57,404 GitHub stars, 5,727 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped today. erlang.mk has 587 stars, 237 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 9,679% (57,404 vs 587 stars). Appwrite is written in PHP under BSD-3-Clause; erlang.mk is written in Makefile under ISC. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, erlang.mk 40%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Appwrite ★ 57K erlang.mk ★ 587 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Appwrite erlang.mk
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 587
License BSD-3-Clause ISC
Written in PHP Makefile
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 237
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Appwrite if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Appwrite profile →

pick erlang.mk if

  • You want the erlang.mk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the ISC license terms
  • Your stack matches Makefile
  • You evaluated both and erlang.mk fits your workflow better

full erlang.mk profile →

About Appwrite

Appwrite is an open source backend platform that consolidates infrastructure services—authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, hosting, and real time capabilities—into a single, unified system. It runs as a self hosted service or via a managed cloud offering (Appwrite Cloud), targeting developers who want to avoid assembling and maintaining disparate backend tools.

read the full Appwrite overview →

About erlang.mk

= Erlang.mk A build tool for Erlang that just works. guide] Embrace the power and simplicity of Makefiles. [source,make] PROJECT = webchat DEPS = cowboy dep cowboy commit = 2.8.0 include erlang.mk started] Tested and supported on FreeBSD, OSX] and Get help! server].

read the full erlang.mk overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Appwrite vs vite Appwrite vs webpack Appwrite vs parcel Appwrite vs Harness Appwrite vs Dokku Appwrite vs turborepo Appwrite vs nx Appwrite vs NocoBase Appwrite vs gradle Appwrite vs rspack Appwrite vs devbox Appwrite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is Appwrite or erlang.mk more popular?

Appwrite has 57,404 GitHub stars and erlang.mk has 587. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.

Are Appwrite and erlang.mk free?

Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and erlang.mk under ISC. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Appwrite and erlang.mk?

Appwrite is written in PHP and erlang.mk in Makefile. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Appwrite or erlang.mk?

Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,404 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose erlang.mk if its feature set, stack or ISC licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.