head to head · open source

Appwrite vs corrosion

Appwrite has 57,404 GitHub stars, 5,727 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped today. corrosion has 1,498 stars, 150 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 3,732% (57,404 vs 1,498 stars). Appwrite is written in PHP under BSD-3-Clause; corrosion is written in CMake under MIT. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, corrosion 10%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Appwrite ★ 57K corrosion ★ 1.5K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Appwrite corrosion
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 1.5K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in PHP CMake
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-05-16
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 150
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Appwrite if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Appwrite profile →

pick corrosion if

  • You want the corrosion feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches CMake
  • You evaluated both and corrosion fits your workflow better

full corrosion profile →

About Appwrite

Appwrite is an open source backend platform that consolidates infrastructure services—authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, hosting, and real time capabilities—into a single, unified system. It runs as a self hosted service or via a managed cloud offering (Appwrite Cloud), targeting developers who want to avoid assembling and maintaining disparate backend tools.

read the full Appwrite overview →

About corrosion

Corrosion Corrosion, formerly known as cmake cargo, is a tool for integrating Rust into an existing CMake project. Corrosion can automatically import executables, static libraries, and dynamic libraries from a workspace or package manifest ( Cargo.toml file). Features Automatic Import of Executable, Static, and Shared Libraries from Rust Crate Easy Installation of Rust Executables Trivially Link Rust Executables to C/C++ Libraries in Tree Multi Config Generator Support Simple Cross Compilation Sample Usage with FetchContent Using the CMake FetchContent module allows you to easily integrate corrosion into your bui…

read the full corrosion overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Appwrite vs vite Appwrite vs webpack Appwrite vs parcel Appwrite vs Harness Appwrite vs Dokku Appwrite vs turborepo Appwrite vs nx Appwrite vs NocoBase Appwrite vs gradle Appwrite vs rspack Appwrite vs devbox Appwrite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is Appwrite or corrosion more popular?

Appwrite has 57,404 GitHub stars and corrosion has 1,498. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.

Are Appwrite and corrosion free?

Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and corrosion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Appwrite and corrosion?

Appwrite is written in PHP and corrosion in CMake. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Appwrite or corrosion?

Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,404 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose corrosion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.