head to head · open source
Appwrite vs corrosion
Appwrite has 57,854 GitHub stars, 5,830 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. corrosion has 1,519 stars, 157 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 3,709% (57,854 vs 1,519 stars). Appwrite is written in TypeScript under BSD-3-Clause; corrosion is written in CMake under MIT. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, corrosion 10%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Appwrite | corrosion | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 58K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | CMake |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.8K | ⑂ 157 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Appwrite if
- You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick corrosion if
- You want the corrosion feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches CMake
- You evaluated both and corrosion fits your workflow better
About Appwrite
Appwrite Appwrite is an open source, all in one development platform. Use built in backend infrastructure and web hosting, all from a single place. English 简体中文 Appwrite is an open source development platform for building web, mobile, and AI applications. It brings together backend infrastructure and web hosting in one place, so teams can build, ship, and scale without stitching together a fragmented stack. Appwrite is available as a managed cloud platform and can also be self hosted on infrastructure you control. With Appwrite, you can add authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, realtime…
read the full Appwrite overview →
About corrosion
Corrosion Corrosion, formerly known as cmake cargo, is a tool for integrating Rust into an existing CMake project. Corrosion can automatically import executables, static libraries, and dynamic libraries from a workspace or package manifest ( Cargo.toml file). Features Automatic Import of Executable, Static, and Shared Libraries from Rust Crate Easy Installation of Rust Executables Trivially Link Rust Executables to C/C++ Libraries in Tree Multi Config Generator Support Simple Cross Compilation Sample Usage with FetchContent Using the CMake FetchContent module allows you to easily integrate corrosion into your…
read the full corrosion overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Appwrite or corrosion more popular?
Appwrite has 57,854 GitHub stars and corrosion has 1,519. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.
Are Appwrite and corrosion free?
Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and corrosion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Appwrite and corrosion?
Appwrite is written in TypeScript and corrosion in CMake. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Appwrite or corrosion?
Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,854 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose corrosion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.