head to head · open source
Appwrite vs Ceedling
Appwrite has 57,843 GitHub stars, 5,827 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ceedling has 861 stars, 274 forks, 248 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Appwrite leads on adoption by 6,618% (57,843 vs 861 stars). Appwrite is written in TypeScript under BSD-3-Clause; Ceedling is written in Ruby under MIT. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Ceedling 32%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Appwrite | Ceedling | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 58K | ★ 861 |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.8K | ⑂ 274 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Appwrite if
- You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Ceedling if
- You want the Ceedling feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and Ceedling fits your workflow better
About Appwrite
Appwrite Appwrite is an open source, all in one development platform. Use built in backend infrastructure and web hosting, all from a single place. English 简体中文 Appwrite is an open source development platform for building web, mobile, and AI applications. It brings together backend infrastructure and web hosting in one place, so teams can build, ship, and scale without stitching together a fragmented stack. Appwrite is available as a managed cloud platform and can also be self hosted on infrastructure you control. With Appwrite, you can add authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, realtime…
read the full Appwrite overview →
About Ceedling
Ceedling ======== Ceedling 1.1.8 is the latest and greatest. See [ Release Notes ][release notes], Changelog , [ Breaking Changes ][breaking changes], and [ Known Issues ][known issues]. See 🚀 Getting Started for installation and new project set up. New goodies in 1.1.x: A [Partial][partials docs] allows a test to mix mocked and real functions from the same source module in a single test file and enables testing of static and inline functions without modifying source code. Ceedling is now complemented by a full, searchable [documentation site][ceedling docs site] available both online and as a local bundle…
read the full Ceedling overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Appwrite or Ceedling more popular?
Appwrite has 57,843 GitHub stars and Ceedling has 861. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.
Are Appwrite and Ceedling free?
Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Ceedling under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Appwrite and Ceedling?
Appwrite is written in TypeScript and Ceedling in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Appwrite or Ceedling?
Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,843 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose Ceedling if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.