head to head · open source
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs npq
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 36,102 GitHub stars, 4,415 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. npq has 1,796 stars, 43 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills leads on adoption by 1,910% (36,102 vs 1,796 stars). Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python under Apache-2.0; npq is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, npq 2%. npq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | npq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 36K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-08-31 | 2026-11-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 43 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if
- You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick npq if
- You want the npq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and npq fits your workflow better
About Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills The largest open source cybersecurity skills library for AI agents 818 production grade cybersecurity skills · 34 security domains · 6 framework mappings · 26+ AI platforms Get Started · What's Inside · Frameworks · Platforms · Contributing ⚠️ Community Project — This is an independent, community created project. Not affiliated with Anthropic PBC. 🔐 Authorized & lawful use only. This library includes offensive and dual use techniques (e.g. red team C2, phishing simulation, exploitation) intended for authorized penetration testing, security research, defense, and education . Only…
read the full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills overview →
About npq
npq allows you to audit npm packages before you install them TL;DR how to use npq: What it does: the npx tool downloads and execute npq package, runs an install check for the express package and dry run means npq exists regardless of success/errors . Here's a screenshot of npq in action: Media coverage about npq: As mentioned on Thomas Gentilhomme's French book of Become a Node.js Developer Tao Bojlén's A web of trust for npm Zander's favorite list of command line tools Ran Bar Zik's npq review to install safe modules ostechnix's How To Safely Install Packages Using Npm Or Yarn On Linux debricked's How to…
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or npq more popular?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 36,102 GitHub stars and npq has 1,796. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has the larger community by that measure.
Are Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and npq free?
Both are open source. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is licensed under Apache-2.0 and npq under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and npq?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python and npq in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or npq?
Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if you want the larger community (36,102 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose npq if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.