head to head · open source
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs dockle
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 35,453 GitHub stars, 4,318 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. dockle has 3,299 stars, 171 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills leads on adoption by 975% (35,453 vs 3,299 stars). Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python under Apache-2.0; dockle is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, dockle 5%. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | dockle | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 35K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-08-31 | 2026-08-10 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 171 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if
- You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick dockle if
- You want the dockle feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and dockle fits your workflow better
About Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills The largest open source cybersecurity skills library for AI agents 818 production grade cybersecurity skills · 34 security domains · 6 framework mappings · 26+ AI platforms Get Started · What's Inside · Frameworks · Platforms · Contributing ⚠️ Community Project — This is an independent, community created project. Not affiliated with Anthropic PBC. 🔐 Authorized & lawful use only. This library includes offensive and dual use techniques (e.g. red team C2, phishing simulation, exploitation) intended for authorized penetration testing, security research, defense, and education . Only…
read the full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills overview →
About dockle
Dockle Container Image Linter for Security, Helping build the Best Practice Docker Image, Easy to start Dockle helps you: 1. Build Best Practice Docker images 2. Build secure Docker images Checkpoints includes CIS Benchmarks See Installation and Common Examples Checkpoints Comparison TOC Features Comparison Installation Homebrew (Mac OS X / Linux and WSL) RHEL/CentOS Debian/Ubuntu Arch Linux Windows Microsoft PowerShell 7 Binary asdf mise From source Use Docker Quick Start Basic Docker Checkpoint Summary Common Examples Scan an image Scan an image file Get or Save the results as JSON Get or Save the results as…
read the full dockle overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or dockle more popular?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 35,453 GitHub stars and dockle has 3,299. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has the larger community by that measure.
Are Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and dockle free?
Both are open source. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dockle under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and dockle?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python and dockle in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or dockle?
Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if you want the larger community (35,453 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dockle if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.