head to head · open source
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs artifact-keeper
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 35,804 GitHub stars, 4,364 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. artifact-keeper has 1,260 stars, 177 forks, 257 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills leads on adoption by 2,742% (35,804 vs 1,260 stars). Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python under Apache-2.0; artifact-keeper is written in Rust under MIT. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, artifact-keeper 14%. artifact-keeper was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | artifact-keeper | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 36K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-08-31 | 2026-11-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 177 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if
- You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick artifact-keeper if
- You want the artifact-keeper feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and artifact-keeper fits your workflow better
About Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills The largest open source cybersecurity skills library for AI agents 818 production grade cybersecurity skills · 34 security domains · 6 framework mappings · 26+ AI platforms Get Started · What's Inside · Frameworks · Platforms · Contributing ⚠️ Community Project — This is an independent, community created project. Not affiliated with Anthropic PBC. 🔐 Authorized & lawful use only. This library includes offensive and dual use techniques (e.g. red team C2, phishing simulation, exploitation) intended for authorized penetration testing, security research, defense, and education . Only…
read the full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills overview →
About artifact-keeper
Artifact Keeper An enterprise grade, open source artifact registry supporting 45+ package formats . Built with Rust. Documentation Demo Website Highlights 45+ Package Formats Native protocol support for Maven, PyPI, NPM, Docker/OCI, Cargo, Go, Helm, and 38 more WASM Plugin System Extend with custom format handlers via WebAssembly (WIT based, Wasmtime runtime) Security Scanning Automated vulnerability detection with Trivy and Grype, policy engine, quarantine workflow Hardened Containers All images built on DISA STIG approved Red Hat UBI 9 base images, non root execution, no shell or package manager in runtime…
read the full artifact-keeper overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or artifact-keeper more popular?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 35,804 GitHub stars and artifact-keeper has 1,260. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has the larger community by that measure.
Are Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and artifact-keeper free?
Both are open source. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is licensed under Apache-2.0 and artifact-keeper under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and artifact-keeper?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python and artifact-keeper in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or artifact-keeper?
Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if you want the larger community (35,804 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose artifact-keeper if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.