head to head · open source
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs afrog
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 35,453 GitHub stars, 4,318 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. afrog has 4,452 stars, 493 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills leads on adoption by 696% (35,453 vs 4,452 stars). Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python under Apache-2.0; afrog is written in Go under MIT. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, afrog 11%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | afrog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 35K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-08-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 493 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if
- You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick afrog if
- You want the afrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and afrog fits your workflow better
About Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills The largest open source cybersecurity skills library for AI agents 818 production grade cybersecurity skills · 34 security domains · 6 framework mappings · 26+ AI platforms Get Started · What's Inside · Frameworks · Platforms · Contributing ⚠️ Community Project — This is an independent, community created project. Not affiliated with Anthropic PBC. 🔐 Authorized & lawful use only. This library includes offensive and dual use techniques (e.g. red team C2, phishing simulation, exploitation) intended for authorized penetration testing, security research, defense, and education . Only…
read the full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills overview →
About afrog
A Security Tool for Bug Bounty, Pentest and Red Teaming English • 中文 What is afrog afrog is a high performance vulnerability scanner with support for built in and custom PoCs. It is designed for fast verification, low false positives, and practical workflows across web targets, network services, PoC authoring, and SDK based integration. Install For source builds or go install , use Go 1.27 or later. Binary release Download the latest release from: Build from source Go install Quick start Scan a single target: Scan multiple targets from a file: Run only high and critical checks: Documentation The documentation is…
read the full afrog overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or afrog more popular?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 35,453 GitHub stars and afrog has 4,452. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has the larger community by that measure.
Are Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and afrog free?
Both are open source. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is licensed under Apache-2.0 and afrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and afrog?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python and afrog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or afrog?
Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if you want the larger community (35,453 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose afrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.