head to head · open source

AiSOC vs coi

AiSOC has 2,380 GitHub stars, 263 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. coi has 732 stars, 64 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AiSOC leads on adoption by 225% (2,380 vs 732 stars). AiSOC is written in Python under MIT; coi is written in Go under MIT. AiSOC has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, coi 9%. AiSOC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (agentic-ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AiSOC ★ 2.4K coi ★ 732 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AiSOC coi
GitHub stars ★ 2.4K ★ 732
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 263 ⑂ 64
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AiSOC if

  • You weight community size — 2.4K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AiSOC profile →

pick coi if

  • You want the coi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and coi fits your workflow better

full coi profile →

About AiSOC

AiSOC is an open source, self hostable Security Operations Center built with Python under the MIT license. It lives in the AI security and cybersecurity operations ecosystem, combining agentic AI, detection engineering, incident response, and MITRE ATT&CK investigation. The project presents itself as an AI SOC where an agent investigates security cases, uses tools, and records its reasoning for later review.

read the full AiSOC overview →

About coi

Coi (Code on Incus) is an MIT licensed Go tool that gives each AI coding agent its own isolated Incus system container — a full Linux machine with root, systemd, and Docker — for developers who want agents to work like they would on a real server without exposing the host or its credentials.

read the full coi overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 391K Hermes Agent ★ 250K Ollama ★ 182K Dify ★ 158K Open WebUI ★ 154K ponytail ★ 149K

Related comparisons

strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs ifixai strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

AiSOC vs strix AiSOC vs shannon AiSOC vs SkillSpector AiSOC vs iFixAi AiSOC vs codex-security AiSOC vs garak AiSOC vs AI-Infra-Guard AiSOC vs giskard-oss AiSOC vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter AiSOC vs nono AiSOC vs CyberStrike AiSOC vs pentest-ai-agents

Frequently asked questions

Is AiSOC or coi more popular?

AiSOC has 2,380 GitHub stars and coi has 732. AiSOC has the larger community by that measure.

Are AiSOC and coi free?

Both are open source. AiSOC is licensed under MIT and coi under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AiSOC and coi?

AiSOC is written in Python and coi in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AiSOC or coi?

Choose AiSOC if you want the larger community (2,380 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose coi if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.