head to head · open source

graphify vs aihawk_mcp_server

graphify has 141,064 GitHub stars, 13,483 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped yesterday. aihawk_mcp_server has 32,357 stars, 4,739 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. graphify leads on adoption by 336% (141,064 vs 32,357 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; aihawk_mcp_server is written in TypeScript under MIT. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, aihawk_mcp_server 15%. graphify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

graphify ★ 141K aihawk_mcp_server ★ 32K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

graphify aihawk_mcp_server
GitHub stars ★ 141K ★ 32K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-31
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 4.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick graphify if

  • You weight community size — 141K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full graphify profile →

pick aihawk_mcp_server if

  • You want the aihawk_mcp_server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and aihawk_mcp_server fits your workflow better

full aihawk_mcp_server profile →

About graphify

Read this in other languages 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇫🇷 Français 🇪🇸 Español 🇮🇳 हिन्दी 🇧🇷 Português 🇷🇺 Русский 🇸🇦 العربية 🇮🇷 فارسی 🇮🇹 Italiano 🇵🇱 Polski 🇳🇱 Nederlands 🇹🇷 Türkçe 🇺🇦 Українська 🇻🇳 Tiếng Việt 🇮🇩 Bahasa Indonesia 🇸🇪 Svenska 🇬🇷 Ελληνικά 🇷🇴 Română 🇨🇿 Čeština 🇫🇮 Suomi 🇩🇰 Dansk 🇳🇴 Norsk 🇭🇺 Magyar 🇹🇭 ภาษาไทย 🇺🇿 Oʻzbekcha 🇹🇼 繁體中文 🇵🇭 Filipino 🇮🇱 עברית Early access to the graphify platform is open before the public v1 launch: app.graphify.com Type /graphify in your AI coding assistant and it maps your entire project (code…

read the full graphify overview →

About aihawk_mcp_server

AIHawk is an anti detect browser and web browsing agent, open source, with an MCP server for coding agents: undetected, no captchas, no blocks. Tell it what you want in plain language. FEATURED IN Business Insider · TechCrunch · Semafor · Wired · The Verge · Vanity Fair · 404 Media Two ways to use this browser agent 1. From your assistant, over MCP Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then install it in your assistant. Claude Code: Codex: Gemini CLI: 2. Standalone: the web UI We bring the interface, you bring an OpenRouter key. Chat on the left, the live browser on the right. Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then open…

read the full aihawk_mcp_server overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

Frequently asked questions

Is graphify or aihawk_mcp_server more popular?

graphify has 141,064 GitHub stars and aihawk_mcp_server has 32,357. graphify has the larger community by that measure.

Are graphify and aihawk_mcp_server free?

Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and aihawk_mcp_server under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between graphify and aihawk_mcp_server?

graphify is written in Python and aihawk_mcp_server in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, graphify or aihawk_mcp_server?

Choose graphify if you want the larger community (141,064 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose aihawk_mcp_server if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.