head to head · open source
agentes-chat vs xyne-spaces
agentes-chat has 1,354 GitHub stars, 236 forks, 150 open issues and last shipped today. xyne-spaces has 826 stars, 573 forks, 514 open issues and last shipped today. agentes-chat leads on adoption by 64% (1,354 vs 826 stars). agentes-chat is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; xyne-spaces is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. agentes-chat has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, xyne-spaces 69%. agentes-chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| agentes-chat | xyne-spaces | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 1.4K | ★ 826 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-14 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 236 | ⑂ 573 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick agentes-chat if
- You weight community size — 1.4K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xyne-spaces if
- You want the xyne-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and xyne-spaces fits your workflow better
About agentes-chat
agentes.chat The open source, self hosted Slack alternative where your team and AI agents work together. Website · Cloud · Self hosting · Features · Discussions Agents join your channels and DMs with a role, an owner and a budget, work where everyone can see, and ask before anything sensitive. They think with Claude, ChatGPT and Codex, Gemini, Grok or any OpenRouter model, use MCP tools, and get a computer and a browser of their own. Self hosting is free and always will be (AGPL 3.0, no license key, no paid tier), or use agentes.chat Cloud, the paid, hosted option: both run this same codebase. Why agentes.chat…
read the full agentes-chat overview →
About xyne-spaces
Xyne Spaces The org OS — your organization's context layer, with collaborative apps built around it. Real time, permission aware and built for agents. At the center: your org's context. Connectors bring in what your organization already knows — Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 and more — normalised into a store built for records and retrieval, and served back to your people and your agents through permission aware org context APIs, so every caller gets exactly the slice they're allowed to see. Around that core sit the org apps — Call · Claw · Agentic Search · Automations · Customer Support Desk · Chat ·…
read the full xyne-spaces overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is agentes-chat or xyne-spaces more popular?
agentes-chat has 1,354 GitHub stars and xyne-spaces has 826. agentes-chat has the larger community by that measure.
Are agentes-chat and xyne-spaces free?
Both are open source. agentes-chat is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and xyne-spaces under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between agentes-chat and xyne-spaces?
agentes-chat is written in TypeScript and xyne-spaces in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, agentes-chat or xyne-spaces?
Choose agentes-chat if you want the larger community (1,354 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose xyne-spaces if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.