head to head · open source
Agent-Reach vs Suna
Agent-Reach has 108,014 GitHub stars, 9,640 forks, 137 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Suna has 20,354 stars, 3,440 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Agent-Reach leads on adoption by 431% (108,014 vs 20,354 stars). Agent-Reach is written in Python under MIT; Suna is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Agent-Reach has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Suna 17%. Suna was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Agent-Reach | Suna | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 108K | ★ 20K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.6K | ⑂ 3.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Agent-Reach if
- You weight community size — 108K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Suna if
- You want the Suna feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Suna fits your workflow better
About Agent-Reach
👁️ Agent Reach 给你的 AI Agent 一键装上互联网能力 当下最稳的接入方式，替你选好、装好、体检好——接入方式会换代，你不用操心 快速开始 · English · 日本語 · 한국어 · 支持平台 · 设计理念 ❤️赞助商 想出现在这里？ 点击折叠 BrowserAct 支持从 Amazon、LinkedIn、X、Google Maps 等复杂网站提取你需要的任意数据。你只需用自然语言描述抓取需求，Agent 就会基于真实浏览器自动探索并测试页面流程，生成可靠、可复用的数据采集 Bot，并返回结构化结果。无需手动构建爬虫，无需编写代码。BrowserAct 内置隐身浏览、验证码处理和高质量住宅代理，帮助你更稳定地完成复杂网页数据采集。新用户注册即送 1000 积分， 立即免费试用 。 在腾讯云 Lighthouse 秒级部署 OpenClaw 全能助手，可通过对话丝滑接入 Agent Reach，给你的 OpenClaw 一键装上互联网能力。 CoreClaw 网页抓取平台与现成数据采集工具，CoreClaw 提供 100+ 现成数据采集工具，支持 Amazon、TikTok、Google Maps、Instagram、Facebook、YouTube 等平台，无需代码，支持 JSON/CSV 导出，仅对成功结果计费。 免费$3测试！ 优刻得星图astraflow大模型…
read the full Agent-Reach overview →
About Suna
Kortix The open source AI Management System The leading open source alternative to Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work. Website · Documentation · Cloud · Manifesto Agents that deliver finished work — reports, decks, code, replies, deployed changes — are now a product category. Every version of it runs inside a model lab, on that lab's model, with your company's brain on their side of the wall. Kortix is the one you own. It's an open source AI Management System : your agents, the skills they share, your company memory, and every connector live in one git repo — versioned, diffable, and shared by the whole company. The…
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Agent-Reach or Suna more popular?
Agent-Reach has 108,014 GitHub stars and Suna has 20,354. Agent-Reach has the larger community by that measure.
Are Agent-Reach and Suna free?
Both are open source. Agent-Reach is licensed under MIT, and Suna has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Agent-Reach and Suna?
Agent-Reach is written in Python and Suna in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Agent-Reach or Suna?
Choose Agent-Reach if you want the larger community (108,014 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Suna if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.