head to head · open source
agent-governance-toolkit vs attestix
agent-governance-toolkit has 6,563 GitHub stars, 1,124 forks, 176 open issues and last shipped yesterday. attestix has 668 stars, 42 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. agent-governance-toolkit leads on adoption by 882% (6,563 vs 668 stars). agent-governance-toolkit is written in Python under MIT; attestix is written in Python under Apache-2.0. agent-governance-toolkit has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, attestix 6%. agent-governance-toolkit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, compliance), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| agent-governance-toolkit | attestix | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.6K | ★ 668 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-13 | 2026-11-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 42 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick agent-governance-toolkit if
- You weight community size — 6.6K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick attestix if
- You want the attestix feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and attestix fits your workflow better
About agent-governance-toolkit
🌍 English 日本語 简体中文 한국어 Agent Governance Toolkit Ship agents to production without losing sleep 🚀 Quick Start · 📋 Specifications · 📦 PyPI · 📝 Changelog brightgreen) [!IMPORTANT] Public Preview production quality public preview releases. May have breaking changes before GA. Policy enforcement, identity, sandboxing, and SRE for autonomous AI agents. One pip install , any framework. The Problem Your AI agents call tools, browse the web, query databases, and delegate to other agents. Once deployed, they make decisions autonomously. You need answers to three questions: 1. Is this action allowed? An agent with…
read the full agent-governance-toolkit overview →
About attestix
Attestix Compliance Automation for AI Agents Make your AI agents EU AI Act compliant with cryptographically verifiable proof. Open source identity, credentials, compliance automation, and trust scoring. 47 MCP tools across 9 modules, 44 REST API endpoints, 531 test suite (440 functional + 91 RFC / W3C conformance benchmarks). Real integrations with LangChain, OpenAI Agents SDK, and CrewAI. Status: v0.4.0 stable (pre release 0.4.1rc1 available via the pre channel). Single maintainer project, community contributions welcome. No independent third party security audit has been performed yet; deploy with the same…
read the full attestix overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is agent-governance-toolkit or attestix more popular?
agent-governance-toolkit has 6,563 GitHub stars and attestix has 668. agent-governance-toolkit has the larger community by that measure.
Are agent-governance-toolkit and attestix free?
Both are open source. agent-governance-toolkit is licensed under MIT and attestix under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between agent-governance-toolkit and attestix?
agent-governance-toolkit is written in Python and attestix in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, agent-governance-toolkit or attestix?
Choose agent-governance-toolkit if you want the larger community (6,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose attestix if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.