head to head · open source
xerj vs Agenta
xerj has 18,817 GitHub stars, 1,435 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Agenta has 4,881 stars, 722 forks, 309 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xerj leads on adoption by 286% (18,817 vs 4,881 stars). xerj is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; Agenta is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. xerj has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Agenta 15%. xerj was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| xerj | Agenta | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 19K | ★ 4.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | Rust | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 722 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick xerj if
- You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Agenta if
- You want the Agenta feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Agenta fits your workflow better
About xerj
XERJ XERJ is a community trusted local AI search that indexes any folder automatically, so your coding agent stops burning tokens reading files one by one and pulls the exact code it needs instead. Reference coding is its main use case and the clearest win: point an agent at a task and it downloads the open source repos closest to it, indexes them, and reuses how they solved the problem before writing its own code. In a controlled study that cut a coding agent's output tokens by 2.7x at the same 16/16 solve rate (case study), and people report roughly 5x in everyday work (field reports). It is enough for a…
About Agenta
The open source workspace for building and running agents Build agents that automate your work by chatting with them. Share them with your team , connect them to the apps you use, and run them in the background . Documentation • Website • Agenta Cloud What is Agenta? Agenta is an open source workspace where you build specialized agents that automate and augment your work. You build agents by chatting with them. You describe the work, connect the apps they need, and improve them through feedback. You can work with your agents directly in chat and share them with your team. For recurring work, you can…
read the full Agenta overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.
Frequently asked questions
Is xerj or Agenta more popular?
xerj has 18,817 GitHub stars and Agenta has 4,881. xerj has the larger community by that measure.
Are xerj and Agenta free?
Both are open source. xerj is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Agenta has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between xerj and Agenta?
xerj is written in Rust and Agenta in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, xerj or Agenta?
Choose xerj if you want the larger community (18,817 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Agenta if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.