head to head · open source

vllm vs rag_api

vllm has 92,055 GitHub stars, 22,349 forks, 7,953 open issues and last shipped today. rag_api has 901 stars, 403 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. vllm leads on adoption by 10,117% (92,055 vs 901 stars). vllm is written in Python under Apache-2.0; rag_api is written in Python under MIT. vllm has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, rag_api 45%. vllm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vllm ★ 92K rag_api ★ 901 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

vllm rag_api
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 901
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-15
Forks ⑂ 22K ⑂ 403
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vllm if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vllm profile →

pick rag_api if

  • You want the rag_api feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and rag_api fits your workflow better

full rag_api profile →

About vllm

vLLM is a high throughput, memory efficient Python library for LLM inference and serving, built for ML engineers and platform teams who need to run open weight models on their own hardware at production scale.

read the full vllm overview →

About rag_api

ID based RAG FastAPI Overview This project integrates Langchain with FastAPI in an Asynchronous, Scalable manner, providing a framework for document indexing and retrieval, using PostgreSQL/pgvector. Files are organized into embeddings by file id . The primary use case is for integration with LibreChat, but this simple API can be used for any ID based use case. The main reason to use the ID approach is to work with embeddings on a file level. This makes for targeted queries when combined with file metadata stored in a database, such as is done by LibreChat. The API will evolve over time to employ different queryi…

read the full rag_api overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

ollama vs vllm llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

vllm vs Ollama vllm vs llama.cpp vllm vs GPT4All vllm vs llama_index vllm vs LocalAI vllm vs PageIndex vllm vs Langfuse vllm vs cognee vllm vs taipy vllm vs dagster vllm vs zvec vllm vs langchain4j

Frequently asked questions

Is vllm or rag_api more popular?

vllm has 92,055 GitHub stars and rag_api has 901. vllm has the larger community by that measure.

Are vllm and rag_api free?

Both are open source. vllm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rag_api under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vllm and rag_api?

vllm is written in Python and rag_api in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vllm or rag_api?

Choose vllm if you want the larger community (92,055 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rag_api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.