head to head · open source
ZeroFS vs versitygw
ZeroFS has 3,164 GitHub stars, 128 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. versitygw has 3,087 stars, 330 forks, 154 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ZeroFS leads on adoption by 2% (3,164 vs 3,087 stars). ZeroFS is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0; versitygw is written in Go under Apache-2.0. ZeroFS has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, versitygw 11%. versitygw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (filesystem), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ZeroFS | versitygw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.2K | ★ 3.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Rust | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 128 | ⑂ 330 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ZeroFS if
- You weight community size — 3.2K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick versitygw if
- You want the versitygw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and versitygw fits your workflow better
About ZeroFS
Documentation Quickstart ZeroFS is a log structured filesystem for S3 ZeroFS serves S3 compatible buckets as POSIX filesystems over NFS and 9P, and as raw block devices over NBD. All three servers run in a single userspace process. Data is compressed and encrypted before upload. ZeroFS differentiates itself from other "filesystem on S3" projects by: Being POSIX conformant Reaching near raw S3 throughput on large files, and scaling to workloads of hundreds of millions of small files Handling tens of thousands of requests per second Requiring no external database service (everything is stored on S3) Being well…
read the full ZeroFS overview →
About versitygw
The Versity S3 Gateway: A High Performance S3 Translation Service Binary release builds Download latest release Use Cases Turn your local filesystem into an S3 server with a single command! Proxy S3 requests to S3 storage Simple to deploy S3 server with a single command Protocol compatibility in posix allows common access to files via posix or S3 Simplified interface for adding new storage system support WebGUI Get more details about the new (optional) WebGUI management/explorer here: S3 RDMA VersityGW supports S3 over RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access), enabling high throughput, low latency object transfers…
read the full versitygw overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ZeroFS or versitygw more popular?
ZeroFS has 3,164 GitHub stars and versitygw has 3,087. ZeroFS has the larger community by that measure.
Are ZeroFS and versitygw free?
Both are open source. ZeroFS is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and versitygw under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ZeroFS and versitygw?
ZeroFS is written in Rust and versitygw in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ZeroFS or versitygw?
Choose ZeroFS if you want the larger community (3,164 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose versitygw if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.