head to head · open source
cubefs vs versitygw
cubefs has 5,684 GitHub stars, 715 forks, 265 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. versitygw has 3,087 stars, 330 forks, 154 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cubefs leads on adoption by 84% (5,684 vs 3,087 stars). cubefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; versitygw is written in Go under Apache-2.0. cubefs has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, versitygw 11%. versitygw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| cubefs | versitygw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.7K | ★ 3.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-22 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 715 | ⑂ 330 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick cubefs if
- You weight community size — 5.7K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick versitygw if
- You want the versitygw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and versitygw fits your workflow better
About cubefs
CubeFS Overview CubeFS ("储宝" in Chinese) is an open source cloud native distributed file & object storage system, hosted by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) as a graduated project. What can you build with CubeFS As an open source distributed storage, CubeFS can serve as your datacenter filesystem, data lake storage infra, and private or hybrid cloud storage. Moreover, it can be run in public cloud services, providing cache acceleration and file system semantics on top of public cloud storage such as S3. In particular, CubeFS enables the separation of storage/compute architecture for databases, search…
read the full cubefs overview →
About versitygw
The Versity S3 Gateway: A High Performance S3 Translation Service Binary release builds Download latest release Use Cases Turn your local filesystem into an S3 server with a single command! Proxy S3 requests to S3 storage Simple to deploy S3 server with a single command Protocol compatibility in posix allows common access to files via posix or S3 Simplified interface for adding new storage system support WebGUI Get more details about the new (optional) WebGUI management/explorer here: S3 RDMA VersityGW supports S3 over RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access), enabling high throughput, low latency object transfers…
read the full versitygw overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is cubefs or versitygw more popular?
cubefs has 5,684 GitHub stars and versitygw has 3,087. cubefs has the larger community by that measure.
Are cubefs and versitygw free?
Both are open source. cubefs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and versitygw under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between cubefs and versitygw?
cubefs is written in Go and versitygw in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, cubefs or versitygw?
Choose cubefs if you want the larger community (5,684 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose versitygw if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.