head to head · open source

HashiCorp Vault vs Keyshade

HashiCorp Vault has 36,260 GitHub stars, 4,759 forks, 1,435 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Keyshade has 768 stars, 263 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. HashiCorp Vault leads on adoption by 4,621% (36,260 vs 768 stars). HashiCorp Vault is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence; Keyshade is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. HashiCorp Vault has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Keyshade 34%. HashiCorp Vault was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K Keyshade ★ 768 category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

HashiCorp Vault Keyshade
GitHub stars ★ 36K ★ 768
License Custom / other MPL-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-04-08
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 263
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick HashiCorp Vault if

  • You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full HashiCorp Vault profile →

pick Keyshade if

  • You want the Keyshade feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Keyshade fits your workflow better

full Keyshade profile →

About HashiCorp Vault

Vault is a secrets management tool built in Go, designed to securely store, control access to, and manage sensitive data such as API keys, passwords, certificates, and encryption keys. It operates as a centralized service that abstracts secret access across diverse systems, providing unified APIs and enforcing strict access policies. Vault lives in the HashiCorp ecosystem and integrates with infrastructure tools like Consul for storage backends and Terraform for provisioning workflows.

read the full HashiCorp Vault overview →

About Keyshade

Keyshade is an open source secret and configuration management tool that encrypts secrets with public key cryptography and pushes them to application runtimes in real time, built in TypeScript for teams that currently keep configuration in a cloud provider's dashboard.

read the full Keyshade overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K JumpServer ★ 32K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase mattermost vs phase puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat

More Secrets Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Secrets Management field.

HashiCorp Vault vs UnKey HashiCorp Vault vs Phase

Frequently asked questions

Is HashiCorp Vault or Keyshade more popular?

HashiCorp Vault has 36,260 GitHub stars and Keyshade has 768. HashiCorp Vault has the larger community by that measure.

Are HashiCorp Vault and Keyshade free?

Both are open source. HashiCorp Vault has no licence declared in this registry, and Keyshade is licensed under MPL-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between HashiCorp Vault and Keyshade?

HashiCorp Vault is written in Go and Keyshade in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, HashiCorp Vault or Keyshade?

Choose HashiCorp Vault if you want the larger community (36,260 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Keyshade if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.