head to head · open source
Steel vs x-reader
Steel has 7,922 GitHub stars, 1,004 forks, 68 open issues and last shipped yesterday. x-reader has 988 stars, 97 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Steel leads on adoption by 702% (7,922 vs 988 stars). Steel is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; x-reader is written in Python under MIT. Steel has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, x-reader 10%. Steel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Steel | x-reader | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.9K | ★ 988 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Steel if
- You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick x-reader if
- You want the x-reader feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and x-reader fits your workflow better
About Steel
Steel The open source browser API for AI agents & apps. The best way to build live web agents and browser automation tools. Get Started · Documentation · Website · Cookbook ✨ Highlights Steel.dev is an open source browser API that makes it easy to build AI apps and agents that interact with the web. Instead of building automation infrastructure from scratch, you can focus on your AI application while Steel handles the complexity. Under the hood, it manages sessions, pages, and browser processes, allowing you to perform complex browsing tasks programmatically without any of the headaches: Full Browser Control…
read the full Steel overview →
About x-reader
x reader Universal content reader — fetch, transcribe, and digest content from any platform. Give it a URL (article, video, podcast, tweet), get back structured content. Works as CLI, Python library, MCP server, or Claude Code skills. 简体中文： README.zh.md / README.zh CN.md What It Does The Python layer handles text fetching and YouTube subtitle extraction. The Claude Code skills (optional) add full Whisper transcription for video/podcast and AI powered content analysis. Three Layers x reader is composable. Use the layers you need: Layer 1: Python CLI Layer 2: Claude Code Skills Requires cloning the repo (not…
read the full x-reader overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Steel or x-reader more popular?
Steel has 7,922 GitHub stars and x-reader has 988. Steel has the larger community by that measure.
Are Steel and x-reader free?
Both are open source. Steel is licensed under Apache-2.0 and x-reader under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Steel and x-reader?
Steel is written in TypeScript and x-reader in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Steel or x-reader?
Choose Steel if you want the larger community (7,922 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose x-reader if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.