head to head · open source

Steel vs pdf_oxide

Steel has 7,668 GitHub stars, 982 forks, 68 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. pdf_oxide has 1,037 stars, 130 forks, 322 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Steel leads on adoption by 639% (7,668 vs 1,037 stars). Steel is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; pdf_oxide is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Steel has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, pdf_oxide 13%. pdf_oxide was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Steel ★ 7.7K pdf_oxide ★ 1.0K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Steel pdf_oxide
GitHub stars ★ 7.7K ★ 1.0K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 982 ⑂ 130
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Steel if

  • You weight community size — 7.7K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Steel profile →

pick pdf_oxide if

  • You want the pdf_oxide feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and pdf_oxide fits your workflow better

full pdf_oxide profile →

About Steel

Steel is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed browser API written in TypeScript that gives AI agents and applications cloud browser sessions, so teams can automate the web without building browser infrastructure from scratch.

read the full Steel overview →

About pdf_oxide

PDFOxide is a Rust core PDF toolkit with bindings for nineteen additional languages, plus a command line tool and an MCP server, aimed at developers and data teams that need fast, permissively licensed text extraction, image extraction, markdown conversion, and PDF creation and editing.

read the full pdf_oxide overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Steel vs Browser Use Steel vs Crawl4AI Steel vs Scrapling Steel vs scrapy Steel vs EasySpider Steel vs Lightpanda Steel vs changedetection.io Steel vs lux Steel vs CloakBrowser Steel vs Scrapegraph-ai Steel vs crawlee Steel vs colly

Frequently asked questions

Is Steel or pdf_oxide more popular?

Steel has 7,668 GitHub stars and pdf_oxide has 1,037. Steel has the larger community by that measure.

Are Steel and pdf_oxide free?

Both are open source. Steel is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pdf_oxide under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Steel and pdf_oxide?

Steel is written in TypeScript and pdf_oxide in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Steel or pdf_oxide?

Choose Steel if you want the larger community (7,668 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pdf_oxide if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.