head to head · open source

stagehand vs zendriver

stagehand has 25,529 GitHub stars, 1,752 forks, 376 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. zendriver has 1,450 stars, 108 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. stagehand leads on adoption by 1,661% (25,529 vs 1,450 stars). stagehand is written in TypeScript under MIT; zendriver is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. stagehand has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, zendriver 7%. stagehand was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-automation, python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

stagehand ★ 26K zendriver ★ 1.4K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

stagehand zendriver
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 1.4K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 108
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick stagehand if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full stagehand profile →

pick zendriver if

  • You want the zendriver feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and zendriver fits your workflow better

full zendriver profile →

About stagehand

Stagehand is the MIT licensed SDK for extracting data and interacting with any site on the web, available in TypeScript, Python, and Go, and aimed at developers building AI agents that need to drive a browser the way a person does rather than at engineers writing test suites.

read the full stagehand overview →

About zendriver

Zendriver is a Python framework for undetectable, asynchronous web scraping and browser automation that drives a real Chrome instance over the Chrome DevTools Protocol instead of Selenium or WebDriver.

read the full zendriver overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 91K Scrapling ★ 86K Crawl4AI ★ 85K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

stagehand vs Browser Use stagehand vs Scrapling stagehand vs Crawl4AI stagehand vs scrapy stagehand vs EasySpider stagehand vs Lightpanda stagehand vs changedetection.io stagehand vs CloakBrowser stagehand vs lux stagehand vs Scrapegraph-ai stagehand vs page-agent stagehand vs ArchiveBox

Frequently asked questions

Is stagehand or zendriver more popular?

stagehand has 25,529 GitHub stars and zendriver has 1,450. stagehand has the larger community by that measure.

Are stagehand and zendriver free?

Both are open source. stagehand is licensed under MIT and zendriver under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between stagehand and zendriver?

stagehand is written in TypeScript and zendriver in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, stagehand or zendriver?

Choose stagehand if you want the larger community (25,529 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zendriver if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.