head to head · open source
stagehand vs workflow-use
stagehand has 25,249 GitHub stars, 1,726 forks, 376 open issues and last shipped today. workflow-use has 4,184 stars, 353 forks, 61 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. stagehand leads on adoption by 503% (25,249 vs 4,184 stars). stagehand is written in TypeScript under MIT; workflow-use is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. stagehand has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, workflow-use 8%. stagehand was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| stagehand | workflow-use | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 4.2K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.7K | ⑂ 353 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick stagehand if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick workflow-use if
- You want the workflow-use feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and workflow-use fits your workflow better
About stagehand
Stagehand is the MIT licensed SDK for extracting data and interacting with any site on the web, available in TypeScript, Python, and Go, and aimed at developers building AI agents that need to drive a browser the way a person does rather than at engineers writing test suites.
read the full stagehand overview →
About workflow-use
Workflow Use is a Python, AGPL 3.0 licensed tool for creating and executing deterministic browser workflows — captured by demonstration or generated from a natural language prompt — that fall back to Browser Use whenever a recorded step fails, and it is aimed at developers and automation teams that need repeatable web tasks rather than one off AI agent runs.
read the full workflow-use overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is stagehand or workflow-use more popular?
stagehand has 25,249 GitHub stars and workflow-use has 4,184. stagehand has the larger community by that measure.
Are stagehand and workflow-use free?
Both are open source. stagehand is licensed under MIT and workflow-use under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between stagehand and workflow-use?
stagehand is written in TypeScript and workflow-use in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, stagehand or workflow-use?
Choose stagehand if you want the larger community (25,249 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose workflow-use if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.