head to head · open source

stagehand vs browserless

stagehand has 24,565 GitHub stars, 1,698 forks, 376 open issues and last shipped today. browserless has 1,836 stars, 91 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped today. stagehand leads on adoption by 1,238% (24,565 vs 1,836 stars). stagehand is written in TypeScript under MIT; browserless is written in JavaScript under MIT. stagehand has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, browserless 5%. browserless was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

stagehand ★ 25K browserless ★ 1.8K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

stagehand browserless
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 1.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 91
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick stagehand if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full stagehand profile →

pick browserless if

  • You want the browserless feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and browserless fits your workflow better

full browserless profile →

About stagehand

Stagehand is the MIT licensed SDK for extracting data and interacting with any site on the web, available in TypeScript, Python, and Go, and aimed at developers building AI agents that need to drive a browser the way a person does rather than at engineers writing test suites.

read the full stagehand overview →

About browserless

Browserless is an MIT licensed JavaScript library that drives headless Chrome and Chromium on top of Puppeteer, giving Node.js applications a production ready API for screenshots, PDFs, and extracted text or HTML.

read the full browserless overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

stagehand vs Browser Use stagehand vs Crawl4AI stagehand vs Scrapling stagehand vs scrapy stagehand vs EasySpider stagehand vs Lightpanda stagehand vs changedetection.io stagehand vs lux stagehand vs CloakBrowser stagehand vs Scrapegraph-ai stagehand vs crawlee stagehand vs colly

Frequently asked questions

Is stagehand or browserless more popular?

stagehand has 24,565 GitHub stars and browserless has 1,836. stagehand has the larger community by that measure.

Are stagehand and browserless free?

Both are open source. stagehand is licensed under MIT and browserless under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between stagehand and browserless?

stagehand is written in TypeScript and browserless in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, stagehand or browserless?

Choose stagehand if you want the larger community (24,565 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose browserless if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.