head to head · open source

shardingsphere vs seatunnel-web

shardingsphere has 20,817 GitHub stars, 6,906 forks, 197 open issues and last shipped yesterday. seatunnel-web has 888 stars, 371 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. shardingsphere leads on adoption by 2,244% (20,817 vs 888 stars). shardingsphere is written in Java under Apache-2.0; seatunnel-web is written in Java under Apache-2.0. shardingsphere has attracted 33% as many forks as stars, seatunnel-web 42%. shardingsphere was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-pipeline), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

shardingsphere ★ 21K seatunnel-web ★ 888 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

shardingsphere seatunnel-web
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 888
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Java
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-01-22
Forks ⑂ 6.9K ⑂ 371
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick shardingsphere if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full shardingsphere profile →

pick seatunnel-web if

  • You want the seatunnel-web feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and seatunnel-web fits your workflow better

full seatunnel-web profile →

About shardingsphere

Apache ShardingSphere Enterprise Distributed Database Ecosystem Building the standards and ecosystem on top of heterogeneous databases, empowering enterprise data architecture transformation Official Website: OVERVIEW Apache ShardingSphere is positioned as Database Plus , a standard and ecosystem built on top of heterogeneous databases. As an operating system layer above databases, ShardingSphere does not create new databases but focuses on maximizing the computing capabilities of existing databases, providing unified data access and enhanced computing capabilities. Database Plus Core Concept : By building a…

read the full shardingsphere overview →

About seatunnel-web

Apache SeaTunnel SeaTunnel was formerly named Waterdrop , and renamed SeaTunnel since October 12, 2021. So, What we are? An open source web console to manage your seatunnel script, and would push them to any scheduling system easily. Click it if your want to know more about our design. 👉🏻Design Compatibility How to start Notice: Some details please refer to the docs/QuickStart.md 1 Preparing the Apache SeaTunnel environment Because SeaTunnel Web uses the SeaTunnel Java Client to submit jobs, running SeaTunnel Web requires preparing a SeaTunnel Zeta Engine service first. Based on the usage requirements of…

read the full seatunnel-web overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Engineering & Integration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.

Frequently asked questions

Is shardingsphere or seatunnel-web more popular?

shardingsphere has 20,817 GitHub stars and seatunnel-web has 888. shardingsphere has the larger community by that measure.

Are shardingsphere and seatunnel-web free?

Both are open source. shardingsphere is licensed under Apache-2.0 and seatunnel-web under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between shardingsphere and seatunnel-web?

shardingsphere is written in Java and seatunnel-web in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, shardingsphere or seatunnel-web?

Choose shardingsphere if you want the larger community (20,817 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose seatunnel-web if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.